SABC Eucharist error contravenes broadcasting code

Unless you're Roman Catholic in which case you believe that the host has literally changed into the body of Christ....
 
But Catholics don't believe it is a symbol, they believe that it is the real thing. What is the problem then?
 
Who is the idiots that made the program. Or was it one of the low budget crap that they bought for R2.000.000

Actually its quite a good production which I enjoyed the few episodes I watched.

Pity that they offended some christians with a line that was not meant to be taken literally,I doubt anyone really thinks that they ate/eat Jesus physical blood and body...I mean really who could think that?

But hey if they want it removed then its no big deal since the series was quite nice with or without that statement.
 
But Catholics don't believe it is a symbol, they believe that it is the real thing. What is the problem then?

If they believe that something that looks and tastes like wine and cardboard is actually blood and meat, then they are even more delusional than I thought :wtf:
 
I think pseudonym is trolling,I highly doubt catholics think that.Anybody catholic here care to verify?

I am not Catholic, but...

The Eucharist is a continuation of what Jesus said to everybody at the last supper. And it was something along the lines of "eat of my body and drink of my blood".

It is a symbolic gesture that gets you closer to Him and hence closer to God.

It is one of the beliefs that differentiates Catholics from other Christians.

So in a sense they do believe that once the wafers/bread and wine have been blessed that they are actually the body and blood of Christ, but at the same time they realise that they are just symbols.

That is what I know, but wikipedia (the infallible truth) has more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transubstantiation
 
I think pseudonym is trolling,I highly doubt catholics think that.Anybody catholic here care to verify?
Catholics dont think that. I am an X-Catholic. I did the whole catechism thing, I did the whole first communion and confirmation. Every Catholic knows it is only symbolic.
 
Catholics dont think that. I am an X-Catholic. I did the whole catechism thing, I did the whole first communion and confirmation. Every Catholic knows it is only symbolic.

from Wikipedia:
According to the Catholic Church, when the bread and wine are consecrated by the priest at Mass, they cease to be bread and wine, and become instead the Most Precious Body and Blood of Christ. The empirical appearances and attributes are not changed, but the underlying reality is. The consecration of the bread (known afterwards as the Host) and wine represents the separation of Jesus' body from his blood at Calvary; thus, this separation also represents the death of Christ. However, since according to Catholic dogma Christ has risen, the Church teaches that his body and blood are no longer truly separated, even if the appearances of the bread and the wine are. Where one is, the other must be. This is called the doctrine of concommitance. Therefore, although the priest (or minister) says, "The body of Christ", when administering the host, and, "The blood of Christ", when presenting the chalice, the communicant who receives either one receives Christ, whole and entire— "Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity".
Transubstantiation (from Latin transsubstantiatio) is the change of the substance of bread and wine into that of the body and blood of Christ, the change that, according to the belief of the Catholic Church, occurs in the Eucharist. It concerns what is changed (the substance of the bread and wine), not how the change is brought about.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X