Samsung Galaxy S3 Official Specs

Rands

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
1
Location
KZNatal
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III at a glance:
•General: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, HSDPA 21 Mbps, HSUPA 5.76 Mbps; 4G (regional))
•Form factor: Touchscreen bar phone
•Dimensions: 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm, 133 g
•Display: 4.8" 16M-color HD (720 x 1280 pixels) Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, Gorilla Glass
•CPU: Quad-core 32nm ARM Cortex A9 1.4 GHz processor, Exynos 4212 Quad chipset
•GPU: Mali-400MP
•RAM: 1GB
•OS: Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
•Memory: 16/32/64GB storage, microSD card slot
•Camera: 8 megapixel auto-focus camera with face detection, touch focus and image
stabilization; Full HD (1080p) video recording at 30fps, LED flash, 1.9MP front facing camera, video-calls •Connectivity: Wi-Fi a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth 4.0+HS, standard microUSB port,
GPS receiver with A-GPS, 3.5mm audio jack, FM radio, TV-out, USB-on-the-go, NFC •Battery: 2100 mAh
•Misc: TouchWiz 4.0 UI, DivX/XviD codec support, built-in accelerometer, multi-touch input, proximity sensor, gyroscope sensor, Swype text input, RGB light

Source

A little underwhelming after all the noise in the last few months. Also not a good looking device compared to the S2 (IMO)
 
This is not a cellphone. This is 'n "mini-tab".

The only thing good about this is the chipset, cpu and battery.

The HTC One X is surprisingly manageable with the 4.7" screen, I wonder if the 0.1" will be the deal breaker?
 
Hmmm, only about the most important aspects of a device.

Things I consider in getting a phone.

Size: S3 too big
Looks: S3 looks like the cheap Android phones
OS: S3 runs Android. :sick:

They still should've gone with a 1.8ghz CPU to make it future proof. Ram should've been at least 2GB. Screen should've been Full HD.
 
Dude, why hate on Android. Both iOS and Android are decent operating systems.
 
Things I consider in getting a phone.

Size: S3 too big
Looks: S3 looks like the cheap Android phones
OS: S3 runs Android. :sick:

They still should've gone with a 1.8ghz CPU to make it future proof. Ram should've been at least 2GB. Screen should've been Full HD.

Thanks, that part put your previous posts into context.
 
Don't get this whole uber fanbooi thing. I prefer Android, but iOS has its merits too and neither of them make me want to :sick:
 
I'm no fanboy. Personal taste only. I had Android devices before. I just like iOS more. The :sick: face was a bit too much, I know. Sorry about that.

I still think Samsung should've done more with the S3.
 
I'm no fanboy. Personal taste only. I had Android devices before. I just like iOS more. The :sick: face was a bit too much, I know. Sorry about that.

I still think Samsung should've done more with the S3.

Lol, yeah the :sick: smiley is pretty strong. iPad + Android phone = best of both worlds :)
 
I'm no fanboy. Personal taste only. I had Android devices before. I just like iOS more. The :sick: face was a bit too much, I know. Sorry about that.

I still think Samsung should've done more with the S3.

And apple should have done more with 4s and iPad '3'
 
Lol, yeah the :sick: smiley is pretty strong. iPad + Android phone = best of both worlds :)
The iPad 3 still outperforms the S3 with the GL benchmark test done by Anandtech 140 vs 103, camera megapixel unchanged, lesser AMOLED display quality vs S2, no RAM shift, no LTE, or any new gadgetry... This in many ways is Samsung's iPhone 4S; I.e. disappointing

How this ranks against Apple newest phone we'll only know later this year; to compare a 6 month old phone (iPhone 4S) does it only an injustice, even worse the S2.
 
When I asked at Vodaworld, I was given an indication of a June/July release. I didn't bother asking about price coz I got the impression they didn't really know.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X