SARS is soft on the private sector: EFF

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,582
Reaction score
10,228
Location
District 9
The SA Revenue Service (Sars) is failing to collect maximum revenue from the private sector, particular from the mineral resources sector, the EFF said on Wednesday.

The Economic Freedom Fighters made the statement following a Sars briefing to the portfolio committee on finance.

Party parliamentary Chief Whip Floyd Shivambu said Sars claimed easy victories concerning its record on revenue collection.

"We strongly believe that Sars is dismally failing to collect maximum revenue from the private sector," Shivambu said in a statement.

"The overall contribution of the private sector into the national budget is less than 20 percent, and this is despite the reality that South Africa boasts one of the biggest corporates in the African continent and the world in both the financial and resources sectors."

He said the tax contribution of all businesses in South Africa was less than R200 billion, meaning corporate tax could not afford to fund the entire education system of South Africa.

"The contribution of the mining sector in the national revenue is less than R25 billion, despite the fact that South Africa is the richest country in the world in terms of mineral resources," he said.

Shivambu said there were known instances of transfer pricing, base erosion, and profit transfers in the corporate sector but Sars was not doing anything about that.

He accused mining companies of creating subsidiary companies outside the country and selling their mineral resources to themselves at a cheaper rate. He said the move was done to evade tax in South Africa.

"This phenomenon is ongoing in South Africa and even the BEE players in the mining industry are involved in transfer pricing. The corporate sector is involved in massive tax evasion, which most possibly amounts to more than 25 percent of South Africa's growth domestic product."

Shivambu said the party would not praise Sars as they did not celebrate mediocrity. He said they would only applaud the revenue service if it could deal with base erosion, transfer pricing, and profit transfer in a cogent and open way.

Party leader Julius Malema has been battling to settle his tax bill. He owes R16m plus interest after failing to submit tax returns between 2006 and 2010.

In 2010 Sars contacted Malema about his failure to submit tax returns. It took Malema 18 months, after many attempts by Sars, to file his outstanding returns.

Malema also failed to register his Ratanang Trust for tax purposes, and Sars had to do this on his behalf. Sars attached some of Malema's property to recoup the taxes he owed.

In May last year, Malema's incomplete mansion in Sandton, Johannesburg, was sold on auction for R5.9m -- although it was later revealed the bidder could apparently not afford the home.

Malema's farm in Limpopo fetched R2.5m at an auction in June 2013, and several of his household goods were also auctioned off.

In May he reached an agreement with Sars and committed to remain compliant in future. He also accepted further assessments for the 2011 and 2012 tax years.


Source : Sapa /kn/ks
Date : 02 Jul 2014 19:59
 
The SA Revenue Service (Sars) is failing to collect maximum revenue from the private sector, particular from the mineral resources sector, the EFF said on Wednesday.

Writer is engaging in the Ad Hominem Tu Quoque fallacy. That Malema may have had SARS troubles, does not make the advice EFF is giving invalid. Note that I'm not saying EFF is giving valid advice, just pointing out the above.

In the spirit of more tax and more nationalisation, comrades unite and sing with me.
 
defending malema a new low... well done :wtf:

Haha. Wrong response. Did you read what I wrote, I'll repeat it for you here:

"Note that I'm not saying EFF is giving valid advice, just pointing out the above."

And it could not be construed as defense of Malema because I did not even defend him. I nowhere said, Malema did not do anything bad or is a victim or some such. But keep on giving faulty interpretations.

Point is that if people want to debunk the "tax the rich as much as possible" left wing theme they can't use false reasoning.
 
Haha. Wrong response. Did you read what I wrote, I'll repeat it for you here:

"Note that I'm not saying EFF is giving valid advice, just pointing out the above."

And it could not be construed as defense of Malema because I did not even defend him. I nowhere said, Malema did not do anything bad or is a victim or some such. But keep on giving faulty interpretations.

Point is that if people want to debunk the "tax the rich as much as possible" left wing theme they can't use false reasoning.

Defend or not, he's a government leader who doesn't take his tax burden seriously. You'd be stupid to take advice from him.
 
Defend or not, he's a government leader who doesn't take his tax burden seriously. You'd be stupid to take advice from him.

Again that's a fallacy. He or his organisation has reasons for wanting to push up tax. It's however not a problem for his reasons if he exempts certain groups or individuals, or what he himself practices.

I agree that overtaxing business and nationalisation would make us into Zim 2.0 or worse.
 
sies man.

They are being their Hypocritical selves.

LEts Start with Union Bosses, politicians and our tenderprenuers. When all that is audited, and made public we can start with the public sector.
 
These EFF morons are so out of touch with reality. Idiot most probably referred to corporate sector as all tax is paid by the private sector.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X