SA's approach to Aids

xtermin8or

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
1,815
Reaction score
0
Understanding South Africa's approach to AIDS

Can Africa follow in the footsteps of the countries of the North in addressing the challenge of HIV and AIDS in the region? What lessons can be learnt? The challenge of HIV and AIDS in Europe and North America has been portrayed as a problem facing marginalised communities - Africans in diaspora, immigrants, men who have sex with men, injecting drug users and so on. Very few cases of HIV infection are attributed to heterosexual relationships.

These countries have many more resources to support their social security system and their populations have access to much more complex health systems. With the advent of antiretroviral drugs, many of the people living with HIV and AIDS in these countries were put on antiretroviral treatment.

However, UNAIDS, the joint United Nations programme on HIV and AIDS, has reported that new cases of HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections are increasing in these countries. UNAIDS says, the rate of new cases of HIV infection in Canada, which hosted the recent International AIDS Conference, has increased by 20% over the past five years.

In an article entitled "The real story of HIV rates in UK", published in July 2004, this is how BBC News reported on HIV infection in Britain:

"The number of people living in Britain with HIV is increasing every year because more people are joining this group than are leaving it. People join the group in two ways: people with HIV migrate to Britain from abroad (imported infections); and people living in Britain pick up HIV (domestic infections).

"Because HIV is still incurable, people only leave the group by moving away from Britain or by dying. The two communities that are bearing the brunt of HIV in Britain are the gay community and the African community."

Despite the difficulties in reducing infection rate, it is necessary to discuss whether South Africa and Africa in general would have been able to follow the path of the North in responding to HIV and AIDS. Is it feasible for Africa to meet expectations that are based on a model from the North?

In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV and AIDS is a generalised challenge not limited to a specific and small section of the population. Most of the cases are attributed to heterosexual relationships.

Our understanding of the difference in the manifestation of this challenge in Africa as opposed to the North is that Africa has high levels of poverty and underdevelopment affecting the vast majority of its population. There are serious health system challenges in our continent, including shortage of human resources and inadequate infrastructure. Access to affordable and quality medicines and limited social security support for the poor, who constitute the majority of our populations, remains a challenge.

With all these challenges, and the fact that we have significantly higher numbers of people estimated to be living with HIV and AIDS than Europe, adopting a model which focuses exclusively on antiretroviral (ARV) therapy would not solve our problem.

As we developed the most appropriate response to the epidemic on the continent, we had to acknowledge that the high prices of antiretroviral drugs as they entered the market meant that we would have had to divert resources from other social needs - education, water, housing and so on - to provide ARVs. Even if we had done so, the probability of these drugs reaching the patients and patients taking them at a required frequency was very low.

What did South Africa do under these circumstances? We said that since there is still no cure or effective vaccine for HIV and AIDS, let us focus on prevention as the first element of our response. Simply put, our first challenge was to make sure the problem did not get any worse than it was.

Secondly, we encouraged our people to find out their HIV status, and made voluntary counselling and testing services available in more than 80% of our facilities.

We then had to look at how to respond to the needs of those already infected. We asked ourselves: what can we do to prolong the period between HIV infection and development of an AIDS defining condition? What can we do to maintain optimal health for people living with HIV and AIDS?

We introduced the Healthy Lifestyle campaign that promotes regular physical activity and encourages people to avoid health risks like smoking, alcohol and substance abuse, as well as unprotected sex to deal with the challenge of both re-infection and new infections.

To deal with the broader problem of the poor nutritional status of our population, we introduced interventions that encourage intake of necessary micronutrients, like providing appropriate vitamin supplementation to pregnant women and children. Vitamins and minerals are now added to staple foods like maize meal and wheat flour and communities are encouraged to produce and eat fruits and vegetables.

These interventions are aimed at strengthening the body's ability to fight infections and maintain good health for a longer period. When infections occur, we provide appropriate treatment as most of the opportunistic infections can be treated even in the presence of HIV.

There is also another element that is peculiar to Africa and that is African traditional medicines. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 80% of our people use traditional medicine for various conditions including HIV and AIDS. So we decided to encourage research and development of these medicines and create an appropriate regulatory environment for them.

Over the past few years, we made progress in reducing the price of medicines, increasing social expenditure and, to a certain extent, improving our health system. Progress in these three areas created a possibility, by the end of 2003, of introducing antiretroviral therapy. Based on WHO recommendations, we made antiretroviral therapy an option for HIV positive people whose CD4 count had dropped to 200 and less.

We evaluated facilities that could provide this treatment with a target of having at least one service point in every district by the end of the first year of implementation and we achieved that. We took this approach because we wanted to ensure that people in both rural and urban areas have access to more or less the same level of care. We now have 231 health facilities providing ARVs free of charge and they are spread across 72% of local municipalities.

Our targets are set in terms of establishing infrastructure and making services available to our people. While we make all the efforts to market these services, we avoided setting targets based on the number of people using the services because there are a number of factors influencing uptake and some of these factors are outside the control of the state.

The WHO, for instance, launched an initiative to put three million people on antiretroviral therapy by 2005 popularly known as the '3by5' initiative. At the AIDS conference in Toronto, it was reported that about 1,6 million people were on ARVs almost 8 months after the '3by5' target was missed.

In South Africa, the experience in the mining industry has been similar.
Only a quarter of the HIV-positive workers at AngloGold Ashanti who need AIDS drugs had taken up the company's offer of free treatment, a local newspaper, Business Day, reported on 22 April 2005. About 2,700 were estimated to be requiring treatment but just 730 workers were taking antiretroviral medicines after one and half years of providing free drugs.
This represents 27% of people initially targeted by AngloGold.

Experts can discuss the AngloGold's experience in detail. But it highlights the complexities involved in implementing a programme of this nature.

We should not mislead the public and claim that there can be easy victories in our efforts to curb the spread of HIV infection and reduce the impact of AIDS. Our collective duty is to emphasise prevention and ensure understanding of all the interventions that government is making available at different stages of the progression of this condition.

From the Letter from the President ( 31 Aug 2006 )
 
And he has authority on the subject because he's the president? Bwahahahahahahahahahaha. Lest we forget he is the idiot that started South Africa's international embarresment over the epidemic with his consistent denial of HIV causing AIDS. In fact, he started the ball rolling that Manto his Health minister so gleefully still kicks around.

:mad:
 
You can dress it up however you like, the results speak for themselves.
 
no offence to your big chief but he is not exactly in touch with reality on any front.
 
I really don't want to tak every paragraph apart -. These excuses are pathetic.

Can Africa follow in the footsteps of the countries of the North in addressing the challenge of HIV and AIDS in the region? What lessons can be learnt? The challenge of HIV and AIDS in Europe and North America has been portrayed as a problem facing marginalised communities - Africans in diaspora, immigrants, men who have sex with men, injecting drug users and so on. Very few cases of HIV infection are attributed to heterosexual relationships.

If this government had of being taking meaningful action - then - we would be in the same place - instead of high heterosexual infection. But no - they've ignored the problem for 12 years and spent any aid money on other things. Or refused it - because they can't spend it on other things.

Do not tell us about how hard done by Africa is - look at Brazil - same issues/same budgets/same realties - do they have hundreds of thousands of people dropping dead - are they the laughing stock on the world? No! Why - because they took meaningful action instead of the psychological sickness in this country.

And don't point at infrastructure - once again they have had the budgets - the deficit if needs be - but no - let them die.

And the rest (of the excuse above) - is the same hogwash.

Your government sets no value on human life - believe it - watch them drop like flies - if they did give a damn this wouldn't be happening.

//or never mind the deficit - how about getting the 98% of taxi owners to pay tax - then the gub would be swimming in even more money than they are (30 billion here or there seems chump change)... but no - rather stick it to the few tax payers in this country -.
 
Last edited:
xtermin8or what is your personal opinion on the South African government's Aids approach and why?
 
Since HIV does not cause AIDS and eating the right foods will effect a cure I see no reason why the denialists would have any problem with having the virus introduced to their systems. Either they'll live and be vindicated or die and cause us no more trouble.
 
On the other hand, what do you do if someone refuses to accept his status, get treatment or negligently continues spreading the virus. The ANC Gvt is doing a lot imho. More than any other nation!

Its not the gvt's fault or our President if people don't act sensibly!
 
On the other hand, what do you do if someone refuses to accept his status, get treatment or negligently continues spreading the virus. The ANC Gvt is doing a lot imho. More than any other nation!

Its not the gvt's fault or our President if people don't act sensibly!

Still dreaming, speak to the pro GVT aids activists and you will learn that Zuma created more harm with his actions than anyone else, and Manto only makes it worse. They should rather learn from our north countrys who does well to control aids, unlike our GVT who squandors the free money they received. They apparently built a huge beetroot and garlic farm with 1000+ showers!
 
On the other hand, what do you do if someone refuses to accept his status, get treatment or negligently continues spreading the virus. The ANC Gvt is doing a lot imho. More than any other nation!

Its not the gvt's fault or our President if people don't act sensibly!
No BTech - you have that one wrong (as so much other it seems)... "The medium is the massage" - IOW - the MESSAGE is all important. This government sends the wrong message (or do they perhaps send the correct one?!) - it takes direction, commitment, leadership from THE TOP.

A little story... yesterday I was at my local roadside vegie stall... some dude was ranting in the background (very loud voice about inconsequentials)... When the (Indian) shopkeeper raised his eyebrow he immediately launched into "I know my rights - our time is now" - and various other mutterings... We had a good laugh. Point being: if this 'simple poor gentleman' has that message and is so certain he has the right to cause a disturbance - then he has certainly received some message - and if he can receive this one he can receive others, ie, direct command, direction from the top -.

(and I have seen many other directions/mandates: "I have no mandate to answer that question" - Woman's Day, general public)

I could tell you many stories of direction from the top. Here we have retro-direction - the further forward we go the further back we look - and the narrower our vision becomes.

And - once again I refer to the Toronto Sun - written by an ex-zimbabwean:

Poisoning the well

In African parlance, this is tantamount to poisoning the village well. Zuma’s utterances of shame were heard by millions of impressionable children and adults alike, in a continent where some people still believe that if you rape a virgin (even a newborn baby), you will be cured of all sexually transmitted illnesses, including AIDS.
Africa in deadly embrace By INNOCENT MADAWO August 13, 2006
 
This letter is all fine up to this point:
We introduced the Healthy Lifestyle campaign that promotes regular physical activity and encourages people to avoid health risks like smoking, alcohol and substance abuse, as well as unprotected sex to deal with the challenge of both re-infection and new infections.
Bugger all to do with treating HIV \ AIDS. AIDS is defined as the condition when you're CD4 T-cell count falls below 200 per microliter of blood. You can eat healthy and not abuse substances and be the biggest fitness freak in the country, these measures will not delay the onset of AIDS. Only the effective targeting of the virus (HIV) will cause a delay.

[edit]
Another thing. Re-infection? RE-IN-F*CKING-FECTION Mr Mbeki? You don't get reinfected (not in the usual sense, what can happen is called super-infection, where you have multiple strains of the virus) with HIV, once you have it, it's yours for life. I mean, JFC, read a book when you have some free time.
In South Africa, the experience in the mining industry has been similar.
Only a quarter of the HIV-positive workers at AngloGold Ashanti who need AIDS drugs had taken up the company's offer of free treatment, a local newspaper, Business Day, reported on 22 April 2005. About 2,700 were estimated to be requiring treatment but just 730 workers were taking antiretroviral medicines after one and half years of providing free drugs.
This represents 27% of people initially targeted by AngloGold.
Perhaps due to the misinformation campaign currently being conducted by the Ministry of Health? If people aren't taking ARVs when they've been infected with HIV, there is a complete lack of understanding regarding the virus and disease on their part.

Maybe it's time to retire Manto and get someone who actually attempts to educate people using actual science and not the ramblings of Dr Matthias Rath?
 
Last edited:
just one problem bud! ZUMA isn't the GVT!. Mbeki kicked him out. This is not Mbki's fault.:confused:
Nothing to do with Zuma - perhaps you would prefer this bit instead:

For the past 25 years, Africa’s “death mat” dance with HIV/AIDS has been worsening, compounded by a combination of political depravity, poverty and archaic traditions whose prioritization by some in the continent defies logic.
Africa in deadly embrace By INNOCENT MADAWO August 13, 2006


It's all in the message - and the leadership - of which there is none - wanton, depraved messages promoting death.
 
how can he......a troll does what a troll does...there are no special days
I suppose you're correct - ignorance doesnt take a break.
 
Oh so now I'm a troll just cause I don't agree with you guys. Pathetic.

No. Because you questioned someone's opinion based on factual information yet you yourself are more than willing to flaunt your opinions as expertise.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X