SA's telecoms market failure

Nod

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 22, 2005
Messages
10,968
Reaction score
2,715
Location
Darling
Source IT-web
Cole contends the USAASA does not have sufficient internal capacity to deliver on its promises. The “weak and ineffective” agency and monopolistic exploitation cost SA R4.2 billion extra in telecoms in 2002. However, the social cost to the country is almost R100 billion a year, he concluded.
 
the country is still effectively serviced by a monopoly
I'd have to disagree - with the low market penetration I would say we're being ineffectively serviced by a monopoly.
 
Everyone seems to understand the problem except uncle Paris, the DoC and their chums over at Telkom.

SA's managed liberalisation policy
Quite diplomacy, managed liberalisation, tsunami protection, all a royal 'f' up.
 
Last edited:
Spend in the telecoms sector is also unusually high – usually it is 3% of gross domestic product, Cole reported. In SA is it more than 5%. “This means resources are being diverted.”

And there you have it folks. If we were in line with international trends we would save 2+% of GDP (a small percentage, but in monetary terms probably a few billion rand) . If you consider that current GDP growth is between 4%-5% and government is desperately trying to get it above 6% you would think that a lightbulb would've gone off over someone's head in govt and they would realise they could much easily attain that desired 6% it if our telecoms costs were lower.
 
Hmmm....can't someone like Richard Branson buy out Telkom, replace it with Virgin and offer really cheap, low rates on everything.... :p

It would benefit him as well as all of us.
 
Would take 3500 years to increase teledensity in the country by double using current budget. that just shows how 'knowledgeable' our goverment is...

Spineless and useless organisation they are.
 
And Ivy says telecoms is not in shambles.. right, we believe you ivy..NOT
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X