Sharks Supporters Thread

Will be very glad to see the back side of Pienaar (nepotism's biggest blemish in SA Rugby today).

Have to disagree with you. If anything he is too good for his own good. He needed a strong mentor who would have forced him to play in a single position (imo scrumhalf) and not all over the backline.
 
Huh? Pienaar is a døøs who only gets to play 1st class rugby because of his dad. Does that make it clear enough for you?

Do not think for a moment lance will let go of his Ruan pienaar action figure so easily. He believes he is the best flyhalf in world rugby and that he will single handedly win us anything.. If lance could he would wisper into Calos' ear to make RP striker for bafana bafana in the WC....

I think Pienaar is very good as soon as he gets into the NR 9 jersey :) He would be my choice as Fourie's under-study.
 
I think Pienaar is very good as soon as he gets into the NR 9 jersey :) He would be my choice as Fourie's under-study.

Magnanimous gesture from a Bulls man!! ;)

And I fully agree with you. Maybe the Bulls should buy him? Then again, I would like to see Hougaard as Fourie du Preez's understudy!
 
Do not think for a moment lance will let go of his Ruan pienaar action figure so easily. He believes he is the best flyhalf in world rugby and that he will single handedly win us anything.. If lance could he would wisper into Calos' ear to make RP striker for bafana bafana in the WC....

And you see what you guys have created.... people who feel that Pienaar is not at all talented and only got where he is because of his father! :rolleyes:

And I will still claim that Pienaar offers a lot more at flyhalf than some of the other preferred fly halves in this country. He offers another dimension... unfortunately that dimension is apparently not nurtured in this country. We prefer our fly halves to stay clean and kick a lot. I say find a full back that does this!

Don't expect any Bulls fans to say anything other than stupid comments like all the Bulls should be Boks. It is their mentality....
 
I'm not saying that RP is a bad flyhalf, I'm saying he is a better scrumhalf.
 
Magnanimous gesture from a Bulls man!! ;)

And I fully agree with you. Maybe the Bulls should buy him? Then again, I would like to see Hougaard as Fourie du Preez's understudy!

Hougaard was never as good at scrummie as pienaar imo. Also would you really move hougaard from wing where he is show casing his running abillity? How many times did he let the stormers defence look plain last night? Also pienaar is a much better kicker than hougaard imo :)

And you see what you guys have created.... people who feel that Pienaar is not at all talented and only got where he is because of his father! :rolleyes:

And I will still claim that Pienaar offers a lot more at flyhalf than some of the other preferred fly halves in this country. He offers another dimension... unfortunately that dimension is apparently not nurtured in this country. We prefer our fly halves to stay clean and kick a lot. I say find a full back that does this!

Don't expect any Bulls fans to say anything other than stupid comments like all the Bulls should be Boks. It is their mentality....

Yes Lance we all saw how good he was in the bok colours.... Steyn scored 5 tries this S14 yet you claim he is a 1-dim player... Shame lance you really really can only be pitied. I mean steyn breaking Dan carter's record must just go a long way to prove your point that steyn is a sub-par player.

Pienaar this season looked like the greatly talented player from 3 years ago... why? O wait because he regained confidence playing in his prefered position!
 
Yes Lance we all saw how good he was in the bok colours.... Steyn scored 5 tries this S14 yet you claim he is a 1-dim player... Shame lance you really really can only be pitied. I mean steyn breaking Dan carter's record must just go a long way to prove your point that steyn is a sub-par player.

Interesting to note that you immediately assumed my reference to one dimensional players was aimed at Steyn. I wonder why that is? True perhaps? My actual words said he "offers a lot more at flyhalf than some of the other preferred fly halves in this country". You see the plural. You see the fact that it was not aimed at Steyn specifically.

But thanks for pointing out that you immediately felt Steyn did match this description ;) And for adding a further description of sub-par. :D
 
Interesting to note that you immediately assumed my reference to one dimensional players was aimed at Steyn. I wonder why that is? True perhaps? My actual words said he "offers a lot more at flyhalf than some of the other preferred fly halves in this country". You see the plural. You see the fact that it was not aimed at Steyn specifically.

But thanks for pointing out that you immediately felt Steyn did match this description ;) And for adding a further description of sub-par. :D

So no factual reply from you? No stats? No real opinion? Ah no surprise Lance your Lancelogic (tm) never fails to deliver a good old chuckle.

O btw I am wondering which flyhalves you were refering to for the boks. Are you saying pienaar is better than Butch who was (together with the argentinian flyhalf) the best flyhalf in the WC of 2007? Or are you saying pienaar is better than.... o wait there has not really been another flyhalf for the boks in the last 4 years than butch and steyn and pienaar... Or do you believe Pienaar is better than Pienaar (this would not amaze me)?

don't worry lance I am sure you will now make some remarks on my statements like :" The bulls supporters are barbarians" or "The sharks can beat any team they only need the right ref" or even "Pienaar's unibrow is my balcony to the soul of rugby". No facts, no stats just the same old Lancelogic (tm).
 
So no factual reply from you? No stats? No real opinion? Ah no surprise Lance your Lancelogic (tm) never fails to deliver a good old chuckle.

WTF? At least I demonstrate some logic, more than what can be said about others!

I discuss your assumption that I was referring specifically to Steyn with my comments and now you want facts that you were? WTF! Catch a wake up, man.

Oh, and I didn't bother reading the rest as you initial sentence pointed out your intention. If you said something important best you rephrase it more succinctly and save me the 30 seconds of my life wasted reading it.
 
Pienaar is not as good as Rory Cockett at #9. His tactical kicking is erratic and his place kicking is even dodgier than Gaffie Du Toit's ever was. I'm really glad to see that he is leaving.

I'd love to see Willem De Waal play #10 for the Sharks with Cockett at #9. Lambie at fullback is looking good and we have a few decent centres too (excluding Terblanche, who really needs to be put out to pasture once and for all).
 
WTF? At least I demonstrate some logic, more than what can be said about others!

I discuss your assumption that I was referring specifically to Steyn with my comments and now you want facts that you were? WTF! Catch a wake up, man.

Oh, and I didn't bother reading the rest as you initial sentence pointed out your intention. If you said something important best you rephrase it more succinctly and save me the 30 seconds of my life wasted reading it.

As I said no facts, no real insight... ps lance, lancelogic (tm) is to logic what american bbq is to braai. (Sorry myself as bull supporters is not smart enough to make other analogies:o).

Lance please tell me what other flyhalves were you refering to?

Pienaar is not as good as Rory Cockett at #9. His tactical kicking is erratic and his place kicking is even dodgier than Gaffie Du Toit's ever was. I'm really glad to see that he is leaving.

I'd love to see Willem De Waal play #10 for the Sharks with Cockett at #9. Lambie at fullback is looking good and we have a few decent centres too (excluding Terblanche, who really needs to be put out to pasture once and for all).

Only problem I have with Cockett is not even his own team mates seem to like him and no matter how good a player is if the team moral suffers I would not play him. But I agree he is really talented.
 
I have a better idea.

@ Lance. Are you admitting that Steyn is better than pienaar in the flyhalf position if you say i assumed wrongly that you were including Morne in the "flyhalves"? If so I will freely admit I made a judgemental error and I assumed wrong.

So lance is Morne Steyn a better flyhalf than ruan pienaar? Or did I assume right and you just had nothing to back up your statement?
 
Last edited:
Firstly @ trollboy, aka pixual - he's only playing coz of his dad? lol, a comfy tinfoil hat is it? chop.

Secondly - this whole Kockett is unliked thing: pure crap ..... he and the coach have a stormy relationship, for whatever reason. Kockett and most of the team regularly do things outside of rugby and obligation stuff - in other words, they hang out with each other. It's the same crud as the 'There's trouble in the Sharks camp' speculation from the upcountry media.
 
Also, Devill .... there is a Super14 thread and a Morne vs Ruan thread, please take this rubbish out of the Sharks Supporters thread.
 
Also, Devill .... there is a Super14 thread and a Morne vs Ruan thread, please take this rubbish out of the Sharks Supporters thread.

Erm it was discussed in this thread so no I will not. But thanks for asking. Now go and enjoy that LAN or cupcakes or whatever :) Kthxbye
 
Erm it was discussed in this thread so no I will not. But thanks for asking. Now go and enjoy that LAN or cupcakes or whatever :) Kthxbye

Erm..... actually it wasn't being "discussed" in this thread at all until you came along with this idiotic post :

Do not think for a moment lance will let go of his Ruan pienaar action figure so easily. He believes he is the best flyhalf in world rugby and that he will single handedly win us anything.. If lance could he would wisper into Calos' ear to make RP striker for bafana bafana in the WC....

Prior to that all we had was someone claiming that Ruan Pienaar was only in the team as a result of nepotism!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X