I finally ran the numbers on my 10 year old Old Mutual RA. It was started in 2008 with what I could afford and has only increased by 10% per annum per the original agreement I signed back in '08. I wanted to see what total I would have got to if I had rather paid this monthly RA figure into my bond and ring-fenced it and its 10% interest "saved/earned" in the access bond.
I added up the 10 years of debit orders and then added 10% interest on the 12 months of debit orders per annum (so interest is low ball because it would be calculated monthly in the access bond and compounded, whereas my simple calculation does not - it only compounds on an annual basis).
The fund is currently valued at R140k. My repayments over the last 10 years add up to R112k, so it has grown by R28k in 10 years.
If I had saved via my access bond at a minimum of 10% per annum, compounded monthly, the investment would be worth over R175k now and would be ringfenced via a spreadsheet which keeps track of all extra payments into my access bond.
Now, considering how poor markets are behaving and have been and will for the foreseeable future, I am seriously considering switching this RA to the access bond saving method. Yes I will lose out on the small tax advantage of an RA, but the growth will way outperform the RA. Also note that I am a religious saver - the money saved and ringfenced in the Access Bond will NEVER be touched until retirement. I also understand that the current R140k value will still grow without continued repayments, but will not be accessible until retirement.
Why should I not switch to the Access Bond facility for this monthly repayment? I feel my financial advisor will not be straight with me were I to ask him because of commission and it is his livelihood...
Informed opinions and comments would be appreciated.
I added up the 10 years of debit orders and then added 10% interest on the 12 months of debit orders per annum (so interest is low ball because it would be calculated monthly in the access bond and compounded, whereas my simple calculation does not - it only compounds on an annual basis).
The fund is currently valued at R140k. My repayments over the last 10 years add up to R112k, so it has grown by R28k in 10 years.
If I had saved via my access bond at a minimum of 10% per annum, compounded monthly, the investment would be worth over R175k now and would be ringfenced via a spreadsheet which keeps track of all extra payments into my access bond.
Now, considering how poor markets are behaving and have been and will for the foreseeable future, I am seriously considering switching this RA to the access bond saving method. Yes I will lose out on the small tax advantage of an RA, but the growth will way outperform the RA. Also note that I am a religious saver - the money saved and ringfenced in the Access Bond will NEVER be touched until retirement. I also understand that the current R140k value will still grow without continued repayments, but will not be accessible until retirement.
Why should I not switch to the Access Bond facility for this monthly repayment? I feel my financial advisor will not be straight with me were I to ask him because of commission and it is his livelihood...
Informed opinions and comments would be appreciated.