Small SUVs not all that bright, tests show

HAL 9000

Honorary Master
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
21,679
Reaction score
25,201
Location
HAL Communications Corporation, Urbana, Illinois
Given the technologies available today, there's no reason why any modern car should have trouble illuminating the road ahead, but a new test by US safety authority IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) shows that today's compact SUVs are more than a little dim.

The IIHS, which is better known for its crash tests, recently tested 21 compact SUVs and not a single one of them could even muster a 'good' rating, with just four emerging as 'acceptable' and almost two thirds rating as 'poor'.

"Headlight performance in today's vehicles varies widely. Government standards are based on laboratory tests, which don't accurately gauge performance in real-world driving," the IIHS asserted. "Manufacturers aren't paying enough attention to the actual on-road performance of this basic equipment."

THE IIHS HEADLIGHT RATINGS

Acceptable

Mazda CX-3
Ford Escape (Kuga)
Honda CR-V
Hyundai Tucson

Marginal

BMW X1
Mazda CX-5
Mitsubishi Outlander
Toyota RAV4
Volkswagen Tiguan

Poor

Audi Q3
Buick Encore (Opel Mokka)
Chevrolet Trax
Fiat 500X
Honda HR-V
Jeep Patriot
Jeep Renegade
Jeep Wrangler
Kia Sportage
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport (ASX)
Nissan Rogue (X-Trail)
Subaru Forester

Consider your ‘options’

The best performing of the group was the Mazda's CX-3's optional curve-adaptive LED lights with high beam assist, while the worst headlights among the SUVs tested belonged to the Honda HR-V, its halogens found to be inadequate on all four curves and on the straight path.

The authority also cautioned consumers to consider the differences between models in a particular range as the headlights fitted to the range-topping Hyundai Tucson, for instance, earned an 'acceptable' rating, while the ones fitted to lower models proved 'poor'.

How are the lights tested?

The IIHS tests headlights on its research centre's track after dark, using a special device to measure how far the light is projected on five different approaches: travelling straight, a sharp left curve, a sharp right curve, a gradual left curve and a gradual right curve. The tests also measure glare for oncoming drivers.

VIDEO:

https://youtu.be/tEVLw3aqL6Q

ARTICLE:

http://www.iol.co.za/motoring/industry-news/small-suvs-not-all-that-bright-tests-show-2044974


And it's much the same story for sedans as well:

There may be a reason why people have trouble seeing while driving at night, and it's not their eyesight.

A new rating of the headlights of more than 30 midsized car models gave only one model a grade of “good.” Of the rest, about a third were rated “acceptable,” a third “marginal” and a third “poor”.

The difference between the top and bottom-rated models for a driver's ability to see down a dark road was substantial, according to the study released on Wednesday by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an industry-funded organisation that evaluates automotive safety.

New Toyota Prius: The inside story

The LED headlights in the top trim level Toyota Prius V - the only one of 31 models tested to get the “good” rating - were able to illuminate a straight roadway sufficiently to see a pedestrian, bicyclist or obstacle up to 118 metres ahead. At that distance, the vehicle could be traveling up to 120km/h and still have time to stop.

But halogen headlights in the BMW 3 series, the worst-rated ones, were able to illuminate only 39 metres ahead. At that distance, the vehicle traveling at 60km/h would barely have time to stop, according to the study.

That's important because about half of all road fatalities happen at night or during dawn and dusk when visibility is lower.

The reason for the big performance gap is that there's a lot more to how well headlights help drivers see than merely the brightness of the bulb or even what type of bulb is used, said David Zuby, the institute's executive vice president and chief researcher.

“We found the same light bulb, depending upon what reflector or lens it's paired with and how it's mounted on the vehicle, can give you very different visibility down the road,” he said.

It gets more complicated. The report showed that you can't buy a more expensive model or add an expensive technology package and necessarily expect to get better headlights.

The halogen headlights in the economically priced base model four-door Honda Accord, for example, earned an acceptable rating while halogen and LED headlights in two pricier Mercedes-Benz models were rated poor.

Zuby said with no reliable clues such as the price of the car or the type of light, it's hard for motorists to figure out which vehicles will provide the safest visibility. He recommended car buyers check the institute's ratings on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety website.

FIVE DIFFERENT APPROACHES

The report comes as halogen bulbs are being replaced by high-intensity discharge and LED lights in many vehicles. Headlights that swivel with the car's steering to help see around curves are also becoming more widespread. While these changes can have advantages, they don't guarantee good performance, the report said.

Researchers tested the headlights after dark at the institute's test track in Ruckersville, Virginia. A special device measured the light from both low beams and high beams as the vehicles were driven on five different approaches: traveling straight, a sharp left curve, a sharp right curve, a gradual left curve and a gradual right curve. Researchers also evaluated headlights for excessive glare.

Zuby said they were surprised to find how much headlights varied from the base model to higher trim or accessory packages. Eighty-two different headlight systems were available for the 31 current models assessed in the study.

To get the top-rated headlights in the Prius V, customers would have to specify the advanced technology package, which is only available in the top trim level. Standard halogen lights without high-beam assist in less expensive Prius V trim levels received a poor rating.

High-beam assist automatically adjusts the headlamp range for the distance of vehicles ahead or oncoming traffic.

Toyota officials declined to comment, and BMW officials didn't immediately reply to a request for comment.

Mercedes-Benz said in statement that it was “greatly surprised” by the test, and remains “confident our lighting systems provide important safety benefits for real world conditions”.

Zuby said government standards for judging the performance of headlights “are essentially unchanged” since they were set back in the 1960s.

“They measure the light coming out of the light source - right in front of the light bulb, in essence - and don’t look at how the light is projected down the road, which is what our tests do,” he said.

The institute hopes its study will encourage the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to improve standards, or inspire automakers to make better headlights on their own, Zuby said.

VIDEO:

https://youtu.be/3Sp7nvuOxtY

ARTICLE:

http://www.iol.co.za/motoring/industry-news/most-car-headlights-not-up-to-the-job-2002783
 
A blatant case once again of the designers taking precedence over safety, and having form belie function - Large swoopy headlight enclosures, flowing way back into the fender arches, with 90% of the unit just being swathes of completely non-functional and purely decorative chrome-encrusted bezels, and having tiny orange indicator light globes placed behind clear lenses, which are often invisible when the sunlight reflects of the masses of chrome splashed around them.

The indicators are also often placed inboard, close to the radiator grille, instead of being placed on the corners of the units, as seen in older designs, where they would be much more visible when approaching the vehicle from an angle.

Examples:

1980 Mercedes S-Class - Clearly discernible indicators - bright orange and placed on the corners of the vehicle - no superfluous chrome in the headlight clusters - only the actual reflector lenses are chrome.

s-l160014.jpg

2016 Hyundai Sante Fe SUV - Large swoopy headlight enclosures - tiny orange indicator bulbs, hidden behind a clear lens surrounded by sunlight-reflective chrome.

Hyundai-Santa-Fe-2016-front-view-520x245.jpg

2016 Hyundai Tucson SUV - Large swoopy headlight enclosures - large amount of purely decorative sunlight-reflecting chrome embellishment above the actual light enclosures - tiny orange indicator bulbs, hidden behind a clear lens surrounded by sunlight-reflective chrome, placed inboard next to the radiator grille.

Hyundai-tucson-active-640x355.png
 
Also - what is the point of having side repeater indicator units - either body mounted or in the edge of the rear view mirror enclosures - when they also have clear lenses, often with chrome embellishments, and tiny orange bulbs - W5W or LED's - that are almost invisible when viewed with daytime sunlight shining on them?

EXAMPLES:

VW Polo / Jetta / Golf - Chrome - clear lens - reflector hiding orange W5W bulb

$_1 (1).JPG

Mercedes C-Class Coupe - Clear lens - orange LED bulbs

9750_st1280_132.jpg

Compare the above units to these side repeaters - which are MUCH more visible in all conditions:

Hyundai ATOZ - Orange Lens

Hyundai_Atos_side_20070816.jpg

VW Golf II GTI - Orange Lens

volkswagen-golf-gti-mk1-mk2-S1865228-1.jpg


:whistle:
 
Why are you convinced that one needs to see orange when the indicator is off? At least with a clear enclosure you know when the indicator is on without a doubt(if it's ever used).

I admire your dedication to this rant though, bravo.
 
Why are you convinced that one needs to see orange when the indicator is off? At least with a clear enclosure you know when the indicator is on without a doubt(if it's ever used).

I admire your dedication to this rant though, bravo.

It's because the chrome embellished ones are almost invisible in daylight when the sunlight reflects off it at certain angles - especially in dawn / dusk conditions, when the sunlight is striking them at an almost horizontal angle - at least you can see an orange lens flashing, no matter what angle the sun is at!

Try this test - put on the hazard lights of a car with chrome / clear lenses - shine a reasonably bright torch at the front / rear & side marker indicator lenses - see how much torch light is reflected back by the chrome - then try the same with a car with orange lenses - notice the difference - the orange ones are still visible as there is no chrome 'embellishments' or clear lens to reflect back the torch beam.

:whistle:
 
The problem is not necessarily that designers take precedence over safety. There are thousands of regulations manufacturers have to comply with to build a car, never mind the different standards in different regions. All models comply with legislation, but that is severely outdated. That is the point of this research, they want to get the standards updated. MB made a big deal of their adaptive headlights when it came out, and they did not do well in these tests. Probably because there was no such test when they started with those lights. If this type of test becomes standard and part of legislation, you will see how quickly all new cars get a good rating, or at least acceptable.

My biggest issue with modern headlights is the glare factor. Many modern cars have very bright headlights (MB and BMW specifically), that almost look like hi beams. Makes it very difficult to drive at night.
 
These tests are a bit one dimensional in their results. If on any single run the glare is above their criteria, then the result is automatically marginal...
 
A blatant case once again of the designers taking precedence over safety, and having form belie function - Large swoopy headlight enclosures, flowing way back into the fender arches, with 90% of the unit just being swathes of completely non-functional and purely decorative chrome-encrusted bezels, and having tiny orange indicator light globes placed behind clear lenses, which are often invisible when the sunlight reflects of the masses of chrome splashed around them.

The indicators are also often placed inboard, close to the radiator grille, instead of being placed on the corners of the units, as seen in older designs, where they would be much more visible when approaching the vehicle from an angle.

Examples:

1980 Mercedes S-Class - Clearly discernible indicators - bright orange and placed on the corners of the vehicle - no superfluous chrome in the headlight clusters - only the actual reflector lenses are chrome.



2016 Hyundai Sante Fe SUV - Large swoopy headlight enclosures - tiny orange indicator bulbs, hidden behind a clear lens surrounded by sunlight-reflective chrome.



2016 Hyundai Tucson SUV - Large swoopy headlight enclosures - large amount of purely decorative sunlight-reflecting chrome embellishment above the actual light enclosures - tiny orange indicator bulbs, hidden behind a clear lens surrounded by sunlight-reflective chrome, placed inboard next to the radiator grille.

Give this scientist a bells!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X