State withdraws Callie case

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
Absolute disgrace, after being told by Randburg Court that they had a solid case?
Did anyone see this little punk in the newspaper this morning? In the Star, front page.
Well if he is guilty which I think he may be, he will have to answer to god one day :mad:
 

Abe

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
4,610
What was supposed to have happened in the accident?
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
She was driving a crap car, she had no medical aid...
It was an accident, it happens.
 

Vrotappel

Bulls fan
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
26,018
Once again the police fails SA citizens. Wonder how much the bribe was or is it just incompetence?

JK8's attitude is easy to understand, he is one of those punks that have no regard for other people's lives on the road.
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
Once again the police fails SA citizens. Wonder how much the bribe was or is it just incompetence?

JK8's attitude is easy to understand, he is one of those punks that have no regard for other people's lives on the road.

Lol wtf?:confused:

I do, I dont see what the big idea is, is it coz shes famous?
She did have a Smart, not the safest car in the world, the people in the Opel are alive. She didnt have medical aid.
 

Drunkard #1

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
3,668
The Star mentions that she may have been driving on the wrong side of the road. They don't mention the oke doing anything wrong. Either the papers are pushing out a very biased front page story, or she was in the wrong. Just because she's famous doesn't mean she's innocent and he's guilty. Get the facts straight before you go :mad: the courts for finding someone not guilty.

And as for driving a POS European city car on SA roads, well, you take you life into your own hand for the sake of being "cool".
 
Last edited:

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
The Star mentions that she may have been driving on the wrong side of the road. They don't mention the oke doing anything wrong. Either the papers are pushing out a very biased front page story, or she was in the wrong. Just because she's famous doesn't mean she's innocent and he's guilty. Get the facts straight before you go :mad: the courts for finding someone not guilty

Yip she was on the wrong side of the road, she just came from a party...
Funny that Marine1 was blaming the Lambo driver earlier this year with His so called "facts" about the accident.

Hypocrite!
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
Funny I dont remember seeing those "facts" as you point out, please refer me to the link.
 

LoneGunman

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2003
Messages
4,552
she was famous - therefore every mouth breather fat TV watching couch potato wanted 'revenge' for her death.

if she was drunk and/or on the wrong side of the road, boy oh boy did she get punished for it - and there's no reason for the other people to face any charges at all.

get over it.
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=105808&page=6
Seems that he may have been more in the wrong than her.
I wonder if alcohol tests were ever performed.
All I am saying is that this should have been tested in a court of law.
Now we will never know. :(
Really sad state of affairs.

http://www.ashleycallie.co.za/?p=43


"mandla m says: february 14th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
With 5 witnesses stating Pretorius was negligent and the cause of the fateful accident - Surely they should be given a voice before the Court chooses to withdraw the charges? Surely this is a perfect opportunity for our Prosecuting Authority to prove their capability and intent in protecting law abiding drivers on our roads.

Let’s be clear about one thing…. a withdrawal of charges does not prove innocence. Pretorius may simply be another accused who has ’struck it lucky’ as a result of an inefficient, overloaded, and as a result indifferent, legal system and process.

Several questions come to mind:
Why did Pretorius’ “friends” not stand by him and support him through his “ordeal”? Could it possibly be that their consciences would not allow them to publicly support and be associated with a flawed action, and contradict the facts that lie deep within their hearts. Actions speak volumes.

Why was Pretorius the only person on the accident scene that night, who point blank refused to give a statement to the police investigating the accident, despite the investigating officers’ numerous attempts to encourage him to do so? Surely an innocent driver would be only too happy to cooperate with authorities in presenting his version of events, and ensure the facts of the accident were recorded. And yet, despite his refusal in giving a formal statement, Pretorius still feels entitled to make accusatory statements in the media about someone who is not present to respond.

Why was Ashley’s vehicle in the oncoming traffic lane at the time of the collision? As per sworn witness statements, more than one vehicle at the intersection was forced to take EVASIVE ACTION in order to avoid the Red Renault which entered the intersection at a very high speed, swerving out of control and heading in their direction. Unfortunately, Ashley fatefully chose the wrong direction to move in, to avoid the Renault.

Why are we not raising a society where we teach our youth to be responsible and accountable for their actions, and openly support them in facing the consequences which are due to them? Why do we collectively ignore, thereby condoning, an evidently overloaded and inefficient investigative and legal system which is unable to protect our people? Why do we find ourselves taking advantage of the gaps, instead of closing them?

It is a sad day for innocent victims of reckless and negligent drivers, past and present. It is a sad day for individuals who are investing their hopes in receiving a free and fair trial within a competent and efficient legal system. It is a sad day for Honesty, Honour and Accountability.

- Mandla."

Good points if they are true.
 
Last edited:

captainwifi

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2005
Messages
834
http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=105808&page=6

Why was Pretorius the only person on the accident scene that night, who point blank refused to give a statement to the police investigating the accident, despite the investigating officers’ numerous attempts to encourage him to do so? Surely an innocent driver would be only too happy to cooperate with authorities in presenting his version of events, and ensure the facts of the accident were recorded......

I don't know the details about this story in particular but if you shoot in self-defense you don't ever, ever give a statement: Your lawyer will do that.
From a legal perspective you keep your mouth shut and let your lawyer do talking.
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
I don't know the details about this story in particular but if you shoot in self-defense you don't ever, ever give a statement: Your lawyer will do that.
You are dead right but at5 an accident scene if you are innocent? And just remember that no one was killed ON SCENE. That only happened later. I think they were hiding something.
 

PostmanPot

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
34,953
I know i Participated in the thread :rolleyes:
Where are the FACTS that say that she was on the wrong side of the road, I cannot find them. :rolleyes:
All I can find is a metro cops statement that says so but no official finding.

Huh? JK8 said that she was in a crap car and had no medical aid - fact - nothing about being on the other side of the road.
 
Top