Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft's Security Tools Are Good Enough

DJNgoma

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
2
Location
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft's Security Tools Are Good Enough

When it comes to keeping your Windows PC secure, all of the scare tactics and overblown virus stories out there make it hard to feel safe online. The fact of the matter is that you don't need to pay for Windows security.

From time to time we like to go on long, opinionated rants about subjects that bug us. This is one of those times. So let's have a frank and honest discussion about Windows security, and leave the scare tactics and FUD for money-grubbing corporate marketers.

Source: Lifehacker
 
Guess it all depends on what type of user you are but I tend to agree based on my usage patterns. Since I switched to M$ security policies (M$ AV, OS firewall and regular security updates) I've never had a problem.

Guess my LINUX background also makes me a more security conscious end user and I've stopped blaming M$ OS's for being weak in this field.
 
Guess it all depends on what type of user you are but I tend to agree based on my usage patterns. Since I switched to M$ security policies (M$ AV, OS firewall and regular security updates) I've never had a problem.

How do you know you're not infected?
 
Putting the M$ jokes aside on M$ being an infection on my harddrive, I have no infections or security issues.

But then again I don't use cracked software anymore, I don't leech at LANS, I don't open unknown attachments, I secure my network share write access to my drives and most important I'm cautious of the sites I visit - I'm married so my days of surfing porn are long gone.

As mentioned, based on my usage patterns of M$, M$ security policy is sufficient.
 
I used to use Avast but the nag screens irritated me so I've switched to MSE.
How do you know you're Mac OS isn't infected? :rolleyes:
With which virus? Please be specific so I know what to look out for. :)
 
We installed the M$ solution on some of the machines at work.

One M$-protected windows PC picked up a trojan, whilst McAfee didn't.

There are only two problems with this M$ solution :

1. In the old days of DOS M$ also provided an antivirus for DOS - but it was a rebranded product from another antivirus vendor. (Think it was a stripped-down version of Norton). Sadly, this died out with the advent of Windows95.

2. This M$ Security Essentials will NOT install on a Server product (eg Server 2003). You will have to use a commercial product instead. (I might be wrong... :o)

So far I've found that the M$ solution uses less memory, have less (or little) nag screens and is esay to use - but it is very basic, but it does the job well.

Your Windows will have to be a legal copy as it will not install on illegal versions (WGA etc).

Cheers

Libs
 
I used to use Avast but the nag screens irritated me so I've switched to MSE.

That's the exact same reason I dumped Avast, It's even more annoying on Vista with the security switching, not only get the popup but Windows has to get your permission to let Avast update. Glad I made the switch, MSE is much better at what it does IMO.
 
How do you know you're Mac OS isn't infected? :rolleyes:

Facetious answer to a good question. I can't ever say my Mac OSX isn't infected but so far there haven't been any viruses in the wild for Mac OSX and so far there's only been one trojan horse in the wild in a specific piece of warez. On the other hand, it is well known since the DOS days that the Microsoft platform has been virus ridden and that viruses spread very easily on it. There are millions of them in the wild.

So how do you know you're not infected?
 
We installed the M$ solution on some of the machines at work.

One M$-protected windows PC picked up a trojan, whilst McAfee didn't.

There are only two problems with this M$ solution :

1. In the old days of DOS M$ also provided an antivirus for DOS - but it was a rebranded product from another antivirus vendor. (Think it was a stripped-down version of Norton). Sadly, this died out with the advent of Windows95.

2. This M$ Security Essentials will NOT install on a Server product (eg Server 2003). You will have to use a commercial product instead. (I might be wrong... :o)

So far I've found that the M$ solution uses less memory, have less (or little) nag screens and is esay to use - but it is very basic, but it does the job well.

Your Windows will have to be a legal copy as it will not install on illegal versions (WGA etc).

Cheers

Libs

MSE won't install on a Server, even though the guts of the program are based on Microsoft Forefront Client. It's really the same with all free anti-virus programs, none of them will install on Server editions.
 
I used to use Avast but the nag screens irritated me so I've switched to MSE.
With which virus? Please be specific so I know what to look out for. :)

There are virtually NO viruses for Apple's OS - Nobody really cares :D

Oh - and I don't use any virus protection - no problems yet :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X