There may be a distinct possibility. Some people are born autistic.Just to be clear..are some of you saying psychopaths are born psychopaths?
There may be a distinct possibility. Some people are born autistic.Just to be clear..are some of you saying psychopaths are born psychopaths?
Not surprising at all. Thing is, they're not born like this.
How on Earth can you possibly make this claim?!? :wtf:Exactly what you've said...which means they were made this way by their environment
Noted for later consumption. Thanks.
Just to be clear..are some of you saying psychopaths are born psychopaths?
No. Some might be more predisposed to becoming psychopathic based on the chemistry of their brain though. This is a fact and the same applies to any aspect of the brain that we attempt to pigeon-hole for diagnostic purposes...
I don't think so, there is no evidence for this. Like someone else said though, certain people may have more predispositions or "potentialities" towards certain behaviours than other people, however this does not imply that such dispositions will actualize. This, to a large extent would depend on the environmental factors which may trigger or actualize these potentialities or dispositions.Just to be clear..are some of you saying psychopaths are born psychopaths?
Not surprising at all. Thing is, they're not born like this.
It just demonstrates that the material complexity of our brain is necessary condition for being a rational animal or a proper functioning intellect, it does not demonstrate that it is sufficient. If you are a realist about universals then it follows that there are immaterial aspects to our intellect.I think brain damage that cause emotional and behavioral changes alone, is proof enough that we are the chemical make of our brains.
Just to be clear..are some of you saying psychopaths are born psychopaths?
That's just an argument from ignorance, a fallacy (check out this site http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/). Just because all the factors that caused a 4-year old to kill little animals are unclear, does not imply that the child is born a serial killer or psychopath.I think psychopaths are born psychopaths.
Some serial killers come from loving homes, what in their environment caused them to kill little animals at the age of 4?
That's just an argument from ignorance, a fallacy (check out this site http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/). Just because all the factors that caused a 4-year old to kill little animals are unclear, does not imply that the child is born a serial killer or psychopath.
Not surprising at all. Thing is, they're not born like this.
http://www.gnxp.com/wp/2010/06/12/bad-to-the-bone-the-genes-and-brains-of-psychopaths/All of these findings are pointing to a picture of psychopathy as an innate, genetically driven difference in connectivity between parts of the brain that normally drive empathy, conscience and impulse control. Not a fault necessarily, and not something that could be classified as a disease or that is always a disadvantage.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25078.phpearly-onset antisocial behaviour in children with psychopathic tendencies is largely inherited.
In other words, psychopathy is a potentiality, a disposition, a propensity. It is not an actuality from birth, it needs to be actualized by something else.Its actually genetically hard wired into them.
http://www.gnxp.com/wp/2010/06/12/bad-to-the-bone-the-genes-and-brains-of-psychopaths/
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25078.php
However studies also show that this does not mean they will become killers or anything else per se, like so many other things it requires a trigger mechanism, such as abuse, poverty, social issues etc. to start down the path of becoming a true psychopath.
In other words, psychopathy is a potentiality, a disposition, a propensity. It is not an actuality from birth, it needs to be actualized by something else.
Agreed. But that begs the question, why do governments put so much emphasis on punishment and rehabilitation? Why not simply have a preventative measure set up from an early age to nudge those who might be susceptible into the right direction before they go full Hitler? Surely if would not be more expensive than incarceration.
It seems to me that this is more in society's hands than in that of the kids themselves.
Sure, that is why a functional society on all levels is important. For example, parents play a crucial role in bringing up their children in a proper manner. It is their duty to teach them right and set examples for them.Agreed. But that begs the question, why do governments put so much emphasis on punishment and rehabilitation? Why not simply have a preventative measure set up from an early age to nudge those who might be susceptible into the right direction before they go full Hitler? Surely if would not be more expensive than incarceration.
It seems to me that this is more in society's hands than in that of the kids themselves.
Fun isn't itBTW Techne. http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/) is awesome!![]()
Agreed. But that begs the question, why do governments put so much emphasis on punishment and rehabilitation? Why not simply have a preventative measure set up from an early age to nudge those who might be susceptible into the right direction before they go full Hitler? Surely if would not be more expensive than incarceration.
It seems to me that this is more in society's hands than in that of the kids themselves.
:edit
BTW Techne. http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/) is awesome!![]()
Are we going to have moral police too?
No, just an early warning system.Like measles shots.Dangerous ground. Corrective behaviour methods? Will the behaviour police enforce these rules?
Are we going to have moral police too?
No, just an early warning system.Like measles shots.
If a high susceptibility for psychopathic behavior can indeed be detected early on, why not note it, and keep watch over the kids? It'll have the duel purpose of making sure the kids aren't abused or mistreated.