Subway bread is not bread, Irish court rules

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,678
Reaction score
9,368
Location
Aboard the Nostalgia For Infinity
In a judgment published on Tuesday, the court ruled that the bread served at Subway, the US chain that hawks giant sandwiches in 110 countries and territories, could not in fact be defined as bread because of its high sugar content.

The ruling followed an appeal by Bookfinders Ltd, Subway’s Irish franchisee. The company had argued that the bread used in Subway sandwiches counted as a staple food and was consequently exempt from VAT.

However, as the court pointed out, Ireland’s Value-Added Tax Act of 1972 draws a distinction between staple foods – bread, tea, coffee, cocoa, milk and “preparations or extracts of meat or eggs” – and “more discretionary indulgences” such as ice-cream, chocolate, pastries, crisps, popcorn and roasted nuts.

The clincher was the act’s strict provision that the amount of sugar in bread “shall not exceed 2% of the weight of flour included in the dough”.
 
I miss Subway non-bread bread. Used to find it in Durban but haven't seen them around.
Think they left SA, used to have one close to the IS offices in Rosebank, took a walk down and got me a sammich.
 
200.gif
 
Getting hard for me to have sub for lunch used to have a few shops to choose from now is only woolies that have 3 options.
 
Make a sub at home and take it with you...10 times tastier AND cheaper.

Never managed to convince myself to mealprep. Its also an excuse to actually have a 20 min lunch break other than eating at my desk.
 
I only eat enough for one person so like 5mins of actual eating.

I’m more impressed that you use your lunch break for eating.

I eat at my desk and then take a two hour lunch break afterwards.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X