Survey on mixed marriages

Darth Garth

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
6,207
Reaction score
268
Racially mixed marriages are still controversial. About 61 percent of whites, 50 percent of Indians, 43 percent of Africans and 38 percent of coloureds believed that races shouldn't mix.

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20060606022606565C757849

I am in a racially mixed marriage myself so this kind of hits close to home :).

No surprise that us coloureds being a product of the great racial blender in the sky have no problems with it ... the more the merrier I say ... we will all be brown in S.A one day anyway :).
 
There are 3 types of lies... Lies, Damn lies and statistics ... They dont say the survey respondents were all from Happy Okes retirement village.

Typical of a South African reporter to make it a Racial issue, and not a cultural. Jewish, Muslim and other communities dont support marriage outside of the religion... so what does that make it?

The only barrier is ignorance.
 
well said RichardP. the reporter has taken sensationalism to a new level in this report.jeeeeez. the survey was probably conducted in "i hate blacks ville town place"
 
Each kind on his own, that goes with culture, race religion and everything else in life! You never know what the mixed breeds would bring, look at dogs, the old unfavorable genes could become the prominent creating problems. Then I know PPL in mixes marriages where the brood are fine, others I see walking in town with pigment problems! So the choice is each persons own and that does not mean everyone must do it! I have no problems with your situation and many others for that matter. So have no particular stance on this except it will not be for me personally! It would be my kids own choice, will see if that ever happens!
 
This is all nonsense.
After several thousand years of living in Africa, the paler people are all going to turn a darker shade from the sun in any event. :D
Inter-racial children are only speeding up that process.

Similarly, as a heterosexual person, I cannot relate to same sex marriages, so my view is biased on that point.
 
Last edited:
pupa said:
You never know what the mixed breeds would bring, look at dogs, the old unfavorable genes could become the prominent creating problems. Then I know PPL in mixes marriages where the brood are fine, others I see walking in town with pigment problems!

Yes Herr Doktor Pupa ... your insight in genetics and the human condition is as always most entertaining :).
 
BTTB said:
This is all nonsense.
After several thousand years of living in Africa, the paler people are all going to turn a darker shade from the sun in any event. :D
Inter-racial children are only speeding up that process.

Similarly, as a heterosexual person, I cannot relate to same sex marriages, so my view is biased on that point.

Oh it must be the Southern sun then, Hope I will live to see the outcome. So after 2000 + years the PPl in the Middle East e.g. Egypt have changed pigment? A lot of c@rp if you ask me. Evolution would take much longer, if ever, if that is what you are hinting at! an by then UV will play the dominant role. Maybe the races would all be purple then; unless aliens landed by then and all will become green! :D :D
 
BTTB said:
This is all nonsense.
After several thousand years of living in Africa, the paler people are all going to turn a darker shade from the sun in any event. :D
Inter-racial children are only speeding up that process.

Similarly, as a heterosexual person, I cannot relate to same sex marriages, so my view is biased on that point.
Not quite turn a darker shade. Skin colour is a function of genes. Blacks, whites, Asians & others all have different genes for skin colour. The gene that best supports your ability to survive in your environment is the one that gets naturally selected and possibly passed on to your offspring.

Say for example: It's 50 000 years ago in Africa. A child is born to parents with dark skin. A mutation has occurred in the child's genes and its skin colour is very pale compared to its parents'. This may lead to the child's survivability decreasing (due to harsh African sun) and thus be an unfavourable mutation. The child will have a lower chance of passing this mutated gene along and so the gene is naturally selected against.

So does evolution work (in my extremely simplified view). :p
 
tibby.dude said:
Yes Herr Doktor Pupa ... your insight in genetics and the human condition is as always most entertaining :).
So what is your view regards to the genetics, the human condition and inherited diseases. I am not an expert so would not even take the chance. Then there is the Culture differences, Look at Zuma, I would never be able to act like that and say it is my culture!

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0002E7CA-F27B-13A1-AFAA83414B7FFE9F

This was only determined or discovered in end 2005. So yes nobody not even the scientists are sure. Only Wiki as it was developed by Experts (Internet scientists)!

"We know so little about the genetic and evolutionary architecture of human traits," Shriver notes. "We cannot expect to use human genetics to understand complex diseases most effectively without first working out how fundamental characteristics, such as eye, hair and skin color, are determined."

Therefore genetic effects in mixed races cannot be defined as yet! Each to his kind in Culture and race Thanx!

http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitdna/inh01.jsp
http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitdna/inh02.jsp
 
Mixed mariages are the way to go if you want to stay in the country IMO :-) White + Black = EE children. If you want the best for your children marry across the color line !
 
pupa said:
So what is your view regards to the genetics, the human condition and inherited diseases. I am not an expert so would not even take the chance. Then there is the Culture differences, Look at Zuma, I would never be able to act like that and say it is my culture!

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0002E7CA-F27B-13A1-AFAA83414B7FFE9F

This was only determined or discovered in end 2005. So yes nobody not even the scientists are sure. Only Wiki as it was developed by Experts (Internet scientists)!


Therefore genetic effects in mixed races cannot be defined as yet! Each to his kind in Culture and race Thanx!

http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitdna/inh01.jsp
http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitdna/inh02.jsp
Actually gene diversity has been the key to human advancement (as with every other species) - keeping within a small, specific gene pool is more likely to lead to phenotypic displays (and ill-effects) of recessive genotypes. We all know what inbreeding's results are, for instance.
 
I must be in that 39% because I would most definately marry a black chick. Not a big fat panel van like the government variety obviously, but for something sleek and sporty like Tyra Banks or Stacey Dash I'd be there like a bear. Also, omg and yes please to compact Asian models.

I'll never understand why anybody would worry about who anyone else is marrying. I say that if dudes want to marry dudes, and chicks want to marry chicks, and whites want to marry blacks, so what?!? I'm happy that they're happy.
 
Hulle kan op hulle koppe staan en hulself toe K@K,DAT MENSE DINK HULLE IS N MIERSHOOP,MAAR EK BLY IN PRETORIA
 
fewl said:
I must be in that 39% because I would most definately marry a black chick. Not a big fat panel van like the government variety obviously, but for something sleek and sporty like Tyra Banks or Stacey Dash I'd be there like a bear. Also, omg and yes please to compact Asian models.

I'll never understand why anybody would worry about who anyone else is marrying. I say that if dudes want to marry dudes, and chicks want to marry chicks, and whites want to marry blacks, so what?!? I'm happy that they're happy.
Yeah - I hear ya - I am in the 61%... I think attraction within your same race is most likely the norm (the first people your respect and love are the same colour as you, most likely... which I guess explains why mixed-race children are the most open to this - at 38%)
 
fewl said:
Not a big fat panel van like the government variety obviously

HAHAHAHAHA ... you certainly made my day.

My humps ... my humps :).
 
pupa said:
You never know what the mixed breeds would bring, look at dogs, the old unfavorable genes could become the prominent creating problems.

Quite shattering to see such opinions in this day and age. I suppose you would have believed the Nazi idea of a Master Race lording it over sub-humans? Or is this the ghost of Dr. Verwoerd?
:eek:
 
Its freedom of expression/speech. I lived in the states for a while and the views expressed on the radio are ten times worse than what is discussed on this board.

The racists on the board should IMO be allowed to speak their minds with the exclusion of incitement of violence.
 
fewl said:
I must be in that 39% because I would most definately marry a black chick. Not a big fat panel van like the government variety obviously, but for something sleek and sporty like Tyra Banks or Stacey Dash I'd be there like a bear. Also, omg and yes please to compact Asian models.

I'll never understand why anybody would worry about who anyone else is marrying. I say that if dudes want to marry dudes, and chicks want to marry chicks, and whites want to marry blacks, so what?!? I'm happy that they're happy.
Thats the point well said. Each on his own! On the gay rights I differ but then again who am I to say a guy cannot screw shiit and a chick lick Cuunt!
It they enjoy it up to their arses as long as they leave me and mine as well as others kids alone!
 
JungleFacedJake said:
Quite shattering to see such opinions in this day and age. I suppose you would have believed the Nazi idea of a Master Race lording it over sub-humans? Or is this the ghost of Dr. Verwoerd?
:eek:
Well apart from the implicit praise of eugenics, the example used is actually wrong: it is well-know fact that purebred dogs are more susceptible to gene-based illness.
 
telkomsuig said:
Its freedom of expression/speech. I lived in the states for a while and the views expressed on the radio are ten times worse than what is discussed on this board.

The racists on the board should IMO be allowed to speak their minds with the exclusion of incitement of violence.
Really? What show was that? I think with people like Stern, the topics may be "offensive" to some, but they keep it above the racial slur level.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X