Currantly
Expert Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
- Messages
- 2,745
- Reaction score
- 2,442
So Telkom decided to raise contract prices by varying amounts, across most of their offerings. The reason given for the price increases is apparently 'increased costs' in the 'service' part, as opposed to the 'device' part the total amount.
The way I see it, is that Telkom have violated my contract with them by firstly increasing the amount they debit from me, and, secondly, not giving me any opt-out options in case I didn't accept their price increase/s.
Now, you might say; 'but, it's written in your contract -you should have read the fine print!'...my response to which is: 'well, then what's the #$%^'en point of the contract then?' Isn't the point of signing a 24/36 month contract is that you've agreed to pay the advertised price for 24/36 months? If they didn't want the agreed amount for the fixed period, then why did they bother advertising it?
Surely there must be some kind of law restricting such increases? If there aren't any such regulations, then what's to stop any old geezer from offering a 'flagship device of your choice on a 24 month contract for only 53 ZAR/month', then increasing the amount charged to R5722/month from month 2 onwards?
If Telkom really insist on continuing to debit me the increase amount, then I will return the device to them after they've refunded me the device part of the months I've paid so far, and I'll thus consider the contract repudiated by them
The way I see it, is that Telkom have violated my contract with them by firstly increasing the amount they debit from me, and, secondly, not giving me any opt-out options in case I didn't accept their price increase/s.
Now, you might say; 'but, it's written in your contract -you should have read the fine print!'...my response to which is: 'well, then what's the #$%^'en point of the contract then?' Isn't the point of signing a 24/36 month contract is that you've agreed to pay the advertised price for 24/36 months? If they didn't want the agreed amount for the fixed period, then why did they bother advertising it?
Surely there must be some kind of law restricting such increases? If there aren't any such regulations, then what's to stop any old geezer from offering a 'flagship device of your choice on a 24 month contract for only 53 ZAR/month', then increasing the amount charged to R5722/month from month 2 onwards?
If Telkom really insist on continuing to debit me the increase amount, then I will return the device to them after they've refunded me the device part of the months I've paid so far, and I'll thus consider the contract repudiated by them