Telkom, IS clash over VANS licences

He told the Independent Communications Authority of SA (ICASA) that Telkom contests the idea that VANS be allowed to set themselves up as full-blown infrastructure providers; rather, the determinations simply allow them to use alternative infrastructure providers.

WHAT FSCKING "ALTERNATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDERS" YOU TWOT ... THERE ARN"T ANY! LAST I CHECKED THE FSKING SNO HADN'T EVEN LEFT THE FSCKING DRAWING BOARD!

:mad: :mad: :mad:

Oh wait I get it ... he's saying everyone should just use Telkom!

Telkom <- Show me a more evil company! I dare you!
 
Mobile operator Vodacom stood behind Telkom during its submission to the authority, claiming it believes the ministerial determinations do not amend the Telecommunications Act or alter the market structure.

My my ... look at what a 50% share in a company can buy you ;)

The genius who let Telkom buy 50% of Vodacom should be necklaced.
 
Last edited:
hARTH - Your anger is completely justified.
But - Teklom has a point.
A VANS may not be a full blown Telecoms service provider.
What about the poor SNO that has been promised the position?
I say - Open the industry WIDE open. Stop with this regulatory crap. But - not going to happen.
 
stoke said:
hARTH - Your anger is completely justified.
But - Teklom has a point.
A VANS may not be a full blown Telecoms service provider.
What about the poor SNO that has been promised the position?
I say - Open the industry WIDE open. Stop with this regulatory crap. But - not going to happen.

Telkom will always act in their best interests.

The point is that the government are allowing Telkom to rape and pillage at will.

I guess when the forrmer director of the DOC gets a cushy possition at Telkom less than a year after leaving office it's pointless to bitch and moan ... the relationship between Telkom and the government is crystal clear.

The government holds all the cards and they will play them as they see fit.
 
Yip. Kind of sad. Like watching the corn in the field die, while waiting for a governmint grant for more water.
You get angry, you get sad, you get depressed, and the corn still dies.
But have no fear - it could still rain.
 
<insert violence inducing hate speech here>

Ok I will leave it up to your imagination guys :)
 
Sorry I actually had a point.Doesnt it strike you odd that Telkom is only making a fuss *now* 1 week before the supposed liberalization. Seems like a desperate move to me.
 
I think they are sitting back on their big leather couches with their feet up. Nothing is gonna touch Telkom anytime soon.
 
stoke said:
...A VANS may not be a full blown Telecoms service provider.
That's not the way I interpret it, and with Telkomonopoly trying to spill the life-blood of VANS on the waters I agree that Telkom & its minion Vodacon are trying to play a magician's trick on ICASA.
stoke said:
What about the poor SNO that has been promised the position?
Firstly, we all know there is no SNO, it is poison Ivy's delaying tactic, the SNO will not be any one company, it should be a group of VANS that finance their own infrastructure & give Telkomonopoly a boot up the backside. Having said that, I foresee some other competition-based problems [other than the evil-Spectre organisation that Telkomonopoly fears so much] if ICASA doesn't do its job of regulating.
 
Decotey said:
Nothing is gonna touch Telkom anytime soon.
Except me.......
*cocks shotgun*
 
I tell ya, when I can actually sign up for other telecom services and I phone telkom and cancel my accounts with them will be a sweeeeeet day indeed.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X