The devil in our midst

[Nerfherder]

When has anyone from a church ever been a reliable witness ?

 

[Mineer]

So by your criteria the abominable snowman and the Lochness monster are real?

And aliens.

and don't forget that abominable snowman and the Lochness monster 1337 hackzors and well obviously the super 1337 nerd hackzors ze aliens
covering their tracks electronically is difficult stuff

 

[Jab]

There's a whiff of Poe in the air...

I'll have you know I'm very hygienic. Unless you're referring to the American poet Edgar Allan Poe, for which I would once again offer apologies. Though I don't understand the reference.

 

[Jab]

lolwhut? You're as crazy as the people in that post.

That's not a nice thing to say. If you get to know me, you'll realize I'm a quite reasonable person.

 

[Jab]

When has anyone from a church ever been a reliable witness ?

That's a very bigoted view to hold. I'm sorry for the harshness of my comment.

 

[Jab]

and don't forget that abominable snowman and the Lochness monster 1337 hackzors and well obviously the super 1337 nerd hackzors ze aliens
covering their tracks electronically is difficult stuff

I would like to address these points, but I fear you're simply mocking me.

 

[Nerfherder]

How is it bigoted ?

Any one who believes in things that cannot be proven or verified is a false witness.

 

[STS]

yes, he is just trolling us. nice one Jab

 

[undesign]

I'll have you know I'm very hygienic. Unless you're referring to the American poet Edgar Allan Poe, for which I would once again offer apologies. Though I don't understand the reference.

 

[Mineer]

I would like to address these points, but I fear you're simply mocking me.

pls address these points

 

[TJ99]

yes, he is just trolling us. nice one Jab

Had me going too, but that Poe comment gave it away. Nicely done, the PD crowd could learn something here, they're normally way too obvious.

 

[satanboy]

Satan is very diligent in covering his tracks electronically. We only have the reports of these reliable witnesses.

hahaha stop! my sides are hurting


oer it must be the devil poking me...

 

[Mineer]

hahaha stop! my sides are hurting


oer it must be the devil poking me...

the devil poking satanboy ... incest ?

 

[satanboy]

That's a very bigoted view to hold. I'm sorry for the harshness of my comment.

It's ok, it's only the devil that is influencing you. We forgive you....


bwahahaha

 

[Jab]

and don't forget that abominable snowman and the Lochness monster 1337 hackzors and well obviously the super 1337 nerd hackzors ze aliens
covering their tracks electronically is difficult stuff

Those creatures are clearly fictional, but if one assume they are there are many questions. How did these creatures make contact with these supposed computer experts. How did they know how to make contact with computer experts specifically. Why would these experts help these creatures. What could these creature possibly provide to experts to not only keep their existence secret, but active work to keep them so. Why would aliens need human computer experts, when their superior technology would afford them an insurmountable advantage. These questions clearly show the ridiculousness of your assertions.

 

[unskinnybob]

No, those are ridiculous, except maybe the aliens.

Please explain, in numerical order:
1. What makes an observer of satan and his acts absolutely reliable
2. What makes an observer of UFO activity reliable but questionable
3. What makes an observer of either the Yeti or the Lochness monster unreliable, infact rediculous as per your definition

That's a very bigoted view to hold. I'm sorry for the harshness of my comment.

4. How is you summarily dismissing of the reliability of witnesses in point 3 any less bigoted than Nerfherder's dismissal of religious people's reliability?

 

[Jab]

Please explain, in numerical order:
1. What makes an observer of satan and his acts absolutely reliable

Because Satan truly exists, a witness reporting on his actions would be utterly reliable.

2. What makes an observer of UFO activity reliable but questionable

The existence is possible, thus a witness could be truthful, though attention seeking people claiming sighting may be possible.

3. What makes an observer of either the Yeti or the Lochness monster unreliable, infact rediculous as per your definition

As these creatures don't exist, anybody claiming to have seen them is obviously crazy and their stories may be safely dismissed.

4. How is you summarily dismissing of the reliability of witnesses in point 3 any less bigoted than Nerfherder's dismissal of religious people's reliability?

As addressed above, it's the truthfulness of the claims which makes it easy to dismiss the false witnesses.

 

[satanboy]

oh boy, you are deluded

your logic is not logical

 

[unskinnybob]

Because Satan truly exists, a witness reporting on his actions would be utterly reliable.

You have no proof.

The existence is possible, thus a witness could be truthful, though attention seeking people claiming sighting may be possible.

Yet, you have no proof in favour or to the contrary.

As these creatures don't exist, anybody claiming to have seen them is obviously crazy and their stories may be safely dismissed.

You have no proof to the contrary

As addressed above, it's the truthfulness of the claims which makes it easy to dismiss the false witnesses.

"Truthfulness of the claims" - contradiction in terms. Something remains a claim until it is proven. Then only does it become fact or truth. All of the above are claims. You haven't provided a stitch of evidence to the contrary.

 

[Jab]

You have no proof.

Yet, you have no proof in favour or to the contrary.

You have no proof to the contrary

"Truthfulness of the claims" - contradiction in terms. Something remains a claim until it is proven. Then only does it become fact or truth. All of the above are claims. You haven't provided a stitch of evidence to the contrary.

You have no proof on my lack of proof.