The Great Reset Thread

[Herr der Verboten]

I already own **** all and am always happy everyday !!!!

and being the white devil fills you with multiple orgasms

 

[Grant]

This old chestnut again!
Nobody ever said "you will own nothing and be happy" - it's nothing more than a trope trotted out on the internet.

Consider this, majority of people have bonds on their property - until settled, they are not the true owner.

Motor vehicles on HP or lease agreements - same thing applies.
People using credit / store cards for food and clothing purchases.

And yet, most are happy with their home, car, clothing, meals..

 

[Messugga]

This old chestnut again!
Nobody ever said "you will own nothing and be happy" - it's nothing more than a trope trotted out on the internet.

Consider this, majority of people have bonds on their property - until settled, they are not the true owner.

Motor vehicles on HP or lease agreements - same thing applies.
People using credit / store cards for food and clothing purchases.

And yet, most are happy with their home, car, clothing, meals..

Sure, but I'd argue that those people are happy because they have agency. They have the option to choose a property not to own, based on their own purchasing power and risk profiles. If you remove that agency, things aren't so peachy.

 

[ForceFate]

This old chestnut again!
Nobody ever said "you will own nothing and be happy" - it's nothing more than a trope trotted out on the internet.

Consider this, majority of people have bonds on their property - until settled, they are not the true owner.

Motor vehicles on HP or lease agreements - same thing applies.
People using credit / store cards for food and clothing purchases.

And yet, most are happy with their home, car, clothing, meals..

Even so, one can still be moved if the move is in the best interests of the majority (not ethnic majority). I think this is the case everywhere in the world?

 

[Pineapple Smurf]

This old chestnut again!
Nobody ever said "you will own nothing and be happy" - it's nothing more than a trope trotted out on the internet.

Consider this, majority of people have bonds on their property - until settled, they are not the true owner.

Motor vehicles on HP or lease agreements - same thing applies.
People using credit / store cards for food and clothing purchases.

And yet, most are happy with their home, car, clothing, meals..

i own nothing except my love for you

 

[Pineapple Smurf]

Wait, Ive been day drinking, it's my off week
Please ignore all posts from me this week
Especially aftyer 12pm

 

[barkhausen]

Read about Gesara alternative .America is being prepared for Nesara .Exciting times ahead.

 

[rambo919]

This old chestnut again!
Nobody ever said "you will own nothing and be happy" - it's nothing more than a trope trotted out on the internet.

Actually the earliest I can trace it back to is a WEF propaganda video.....

 

[dualmeister]

Done.

 

[pinball wizard]

Pussy riot sounds like a chick with some nasty STD. Like a pussy that looks like a warzone.

 

[Pineapple Smurf]

Done.

wrong competition
the winners have already been announced last week

 

[Pineapple Smurf]

Pussy riot sounds like a chick with some nasty STD. Like a pussy that looks like a warzone.

Please dont bring @EMAM into this chatroom now, thank you

 

[Grant]

i own nothing except my love for you

 

[Milano]

I suppose that we are living through odd times or perhaps Davos has done the worst PR in human history,

The WEF and the IMF only need member states to buy into what they are selling. The consensus of the general public is of almost no importance, in fact it is likely beyond the grasp of the majority of the general public.

Most countries in the world are members of the IMF, a membership decision made your government not by the general public. The future that is decided by the WEF and the IMF will be the future selected for all of us as soon as the member states agree. You and I will have no say in that future. As far as one can discern the member states have no issue with the campaign.

This is an interesting (if not disturbing) explanation of the type of centralised system that one might anticipate:

 

[Milano]

This is the IMF article discussed in the video:

Winds of Change: The Case for New Digital Currency​

By Christine Lagarde, IMF Managing Director Link: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Article...s-of-change-the-case-for-new-digital-currency

From the article:

For their part, cryptocurrencies seek to anchor trust in technology. So long as they are transparent—and if you are tech savvy—you might trust their services.

Still, I am not entirely convinced. Proper regulation of these entities will remain a pillar of trust.

Really?

Let me be more specific: should central banks issue a new digital form of money? A state-backed token, or perhaps an account held directly at the central bank, available to people and firms for retail payments? True, your deposits in commercial banks are already digital. But a digital currency would be a liability of the state, like cash today, not of a private firm.

Consider a simple example. Imagine that people purchasing beer and frozen pizza have higher mortgage defaults than citizens purchasing organic broccoli and spring water. What can you do if you have a craving for beer and pizza but do not want your credit score to drop? Today, you pull out cash. And tomorrow? Would a privately-owned payment system push you to the broccoli aisle?

Disturbing to actually know that anyone believes this type of control should be in the hands of any government (or the IMF).

On the face of it, it was always fine that government controlled and issued currency. But allowing the state to control digital currency far exceeds the bounds of privacy and control that should be permitted and entrusted to the state (or the IMF).