If you'd really searched for the term then you'd know that what really happens is that some people who have too high a percentage of carbohydrates in their diet consume more food than they need. You'd also know that the insulin response is not required to store dietary fat as body fat. It is not a case of one type of diet leading to weight gain when the calorie content is identical and matching daily requirements. Only excess is stored as fat, and eating excess fat instead of carbohydrates won't help. In the case of protein it is just extremely hard to eat too much.An equal calorific value of carbohydrates will cause more weight gain than an equal calorific value of fat. Google insulin spikes, what causes them, and what they do.
Summarized version - when your body digests carbohydrates, insulin is released into the bloodstream. The effect of this insulin causes the glucose in your bloodstream to be converted and stored as fat.
Eating fat does not trigger an insulin response, which is why the same calorific value of fat will cause less weight gain than carbohydrates.
Entirely.is totally free from blame?
You missed the title it appears.I didn't notice blame? Just a doccie about portions getting bigger and bigger -people too.
It doesn't help when you have the local government actively promoting junk food either.http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/why-burger-king-got-key-to-city-1.1530527#.U04PHHNBvqA
not to mention their bottomless soda's. But if you're happy to support obesity and diabetes, nothing I can do about that"Junk food" is a BS term. Bread, meat, dairy and vegetables are real food. In the form of a burger and chips they are a high carb meal but there is no reason why you can't get the bulk of your carbs in one meal. In fact calling real food "junk" is almost criminally irresponsible.
Yip typical BBC BS.
Always is a victim and never responsible. If you're not responsible for yourself somebody else is and that's the nanny state bureaucrat who gains all the power that comes with the responsibility.
not to mention their bottomless soda's. But if you're happy to support obesity and diabetes, nothing I can do about that
If you create a culture where people can access pre-made food at prices comparable to supermarket cost of fresh fruit and vegetables, and you load that food with sugars and addicting ingredients, and spend hundreds of millions of dollars advertising it, there's surely some element of blame somewhere.
Yes, the people became fat because they chose to eat fast food rather than cooking and monitoring their own diets, but willpower is a scarce and easily manipulated resource; and all of the societal pressures fall on the side of more and easier consumption rather than health promotion.
Lol. Do you honestly think the cheese burger was designed by evil geniuses to addict the masses?
There is a follow up series called The Men Who Made Us Thin
You missed the title it appears.
On Youtube it show three parts. Each about an hour long. Yes?
How did you get that from what I said? There's no fast food cabal at work. I love fast food, in moderation. I mean that the forces of capitalism, and the financial incentives that work into that, play against the poor - in a similar way to credit traps, they're the ones who got themselves into that kind of trouble; but the forces that worked to get them there could have been mitigated by societal interventions.
and you load that food with sugars and addicting ingredients, and spend hundreds of millions of dollars advertising it, there's surely some element of blame somewhere.
Nutritional value has little to do with obesity. It's either you eat too much, or you don't.
Derp. Certainly, water and fibre (i.e. everything expelled by the body) would not cause weight gain, but everything else does. It's simple physics.
Saying things like :
really does sound as if fast food companies research what ingredients were most addictive and consciously increase the contents of those ingredients instead of just selling foods that happen to popular because they happen to contain those foods.
We cook at home 95% of the time, and yes it tends to be healthier just by the nature of un-prepackaged recipes.I wouldn't compare what the fast food industry to what credit companies do if allowed to. Fast food companies merely supply products that people want cheaply and efficiently. You can eat just as unhealthily at home and probably would if you had to. Everything in a McMeal can be bought in the super market. The belief that if people were forced to cook at home they would cook healthy is a very big assumption to make.
As I said, willpower is a limited resource and it's not hard to break it down by simply offering a choice; like say, $.30 to supersize. People are easily manipulated.If people generally preferred healthy food the fast food industry would be making millions of relatively cheap and plentiful healthy foods.
that's the one Razed, Jacques Peretti.