Unhappy1
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,878
- Reaction score
- 21,798
Funny, I thought it was snoop that was doing that.
Both are but snoop isnt a Russian publication, or is he?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Funny, I thought it was snoop that was doing that.
You are the one who is criticising his bringing up the fact that the UK media isn't impartial, not so?Both are but snoop isnt a Russian publication, or is he?
You are the one who is criticising his bringing up the fact that the UK media isn't impartial, not so?
Right, so RT has a bias. Does that detract from the accuracy of what Snoop said?I have not criticised him, i asked him for a link. You read into things that aren't there.
Right, so RT has a bias. Does that detract from the accuracy what Snoop said?
Otherwise what is the reason for your question?
I just see you could have stated your opinion without baiting a further response out of Snoop. So it's more a case of me calling you on your BS.Answered this already. You love going in circles, are you retired?
I just see you could have stated your opinion without baiting a further response out of Snoop. So it's more a case of me calling you on your BS.
Edit: And as a general rule, I never pass up an opportunity to be proven wrong.
Why would he have to provide you with a link to something you already know if you didn't want something specific from him?There is that imagination again.
Why would he have to provide you with a link to something you already know if you didn't want something specific from him?
One reasonable explanation, that's all it will take. I'm sure you can prove it's in my imagination by providing a reasonable alternative, no?
I dont peruse RT, no idea if they have an article on Putin or not. I would be interested to read that article if they had written one.
Actually, how the hell would you know this if you hadn't first looked?Yes, i have at least read stories in English media on Cameron's father. Even if its not as much as it should be, its more than RT's. And RT has the nerve to write an article about it.
Actually, how the hell would you know this if you hadn't first looked?
Do you like making factual claims without investigating things, or are you simply lying about your question after all?
https://www.rt.com/news/338338-panama-papers-putin-outrage/
Well, they're discussing the issue loud and clear, but I don't think in the way you want.
Niether of us made such a statement though.The post was based on yours and Narrows posts that an article doesn't exist. Are you done now?
Niether of us made such a statement though.
And I can access his article just fine, so I don't know what you're talking about.
You are not able to speak to the fact of the matter, then?So an article does exist?
Misread. Thought you said Narrows posts an article that doesn't exist.And i have no idea what you're talking about either.
interesting .
why does he not use a russian car as presidential vehicle ?
View attachment 353636
is a lada not good enough for dear leader comrade vladmir
You are not able to speak to the fact of the matter, then?
Edit: In case we're not clear, whether or not an article does or does not exist has got nothing to do with the fact that you presented an assumption as fact for which no positive claim was made.
What space launch vehicle is regularly killing its passengers?He's Russian, they're a terribly smart nation, when you need a car, use the best in the world (Germany in general, I hate merc but whatever).
When you need a reliable assault rifle for your forces, a next generation jet fighter that actually works, a space launch vehicle that doesn't regularly kill it's passengers, great vodka or attractive females in general... well THEN you also go with the best in the world![]()