Massive unspoken problem with going off-grid
With Eskom reportedly planning to apply for another massive electricity price hike and its proposals that households pay higher fixed rates for access to the grid, many people might be contemplating completely severing their grid connection.
However, doing so could have severe unintended consequences for service delivery, which is already in crisis in many towns and cities.
Missing from the argument is that most solar, generator and battery installations are not costed by
uptime ( the cost of own generation vs grid) but by the cost of
downtime — Can my shop run without electricity? if I work from home, can I afford to be idle during load-shedding? and the like — or by lifestyle choice: adding ~R120 k to the cost of a R2-R25 million house might make sense to be able to watch TV, charge phones & laptops and have "civilised" lighting.
The next step for "solar" households will be to adopt EV, using the solar kit to recharge the car. This will have a monster effect on fuel and RAF levies and possibly petrol-pump attendent employment (and tips).
Rather than play King Canute, fighting technology disruption, national and local government needs to redesign their business models:
Allowing households to feed in to the grid means electricity utilities can pay them less than the cost of coal electricity (unlike a commercial power entity, the solar installation is a sunk cost; any recovery is pure profit) and on-sell at a markup to other consumers, rather than losing all their revenue during loadshedding. (This ignore the externalities such as less air pollution, climate change, savings in foreign exchange, etc)
Solar generation creates jobs in the smaller entity sector.
MyBroadband readers should be familiar with the concept of "RAID" [redundant array of inexpensive devices). "Hive" electricity generation is also a risk avoidance over government's "big is beautiful" mindset.
Revenue collections, whether fuel or electricity is already down due to loadshedding (a "sunk cost" and risk to national and local government revenues). Avoiding loadshedding will boost revenues compensating for the disruption.
While the benefits of technology advances benefit the wealthy first, increasing adoption and lowering of costs does trickle down to the rest of us.