The problem with paid social media subscriptions

FjyUnTxXoAEYmxR
 
The problem with paying for a blue checkmark is that you paid for a blue checkmark and probably need help tying your own shoes.
 
Blue ticks probably make sense if you have a business page, but it's a total joke if you're an individual.
 
The problem with this approach is that it's your platform and account security should be at max by default. Why should I pay to make sure someone else doesn't impersonate me or hack my account?
 
But the issue is, most people don't subscribe to these services for "Identity protection". They subscribe because they think a check mark makes them look important, and will somehow make their brand "grow".
 
Ha Ha, the 1992 monster growing even more and slurp up money that could have been used in better more constructive ways where resources wasted as a result would rather have served societies long term purposes, as we all will find out eventually, that Titanic would be difficult to turn around if at all. Yet nobody see it coming(Blinded by easy digital money) where modern corruption will water down to the individual level where everybody has to be corrupt somehow to just make a living. Now we cannot possible living off each others money without doing constructive sustainable things, Nature itself will come and HIT the human race hard..Nature......Resources......Money...Population Numbers...Social-Inteligence.....=Nature is the boss not any leaders proclaimed in this closed system called Planet Earth.
 
Why the heck would I pay to use a service that just deletes accounts on a whim when you dare to object to unfair 'temporary banning'? The moment you don't shut up and take it, you're deleted. This has happened to half the people I know in the last few years, including me. I have better things to spend my money on. Like treats for my dog. Or a toilet brush. Or anything else, really.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X