The Syrian Conflict Thread

That's what the Russian Defence Ministry says, and it's already been debunked. The first reports and images of the victims were coming out hours before they claim the strike even happened.
How come BBC journalist Tom Dugan is saying it's the rebels with their chemical arsenal that was hit? He is based in Damascus.
 
They didn't. They provided arms to the Mujahideen, some of whom went on to form the Taliban some years later. Not AQ or OBL.

I'm sure you've seen the famous newspaper headline containing OBL, talking about leading his afghan army on the road to peace, and praising him for his efforts.
 
Edit: That first video doesn't look like white phosphorus.

I've seen WP and what seems like thermite used in Syria. Often times the thermite is too far dispersed to be an accurate weapon against human targets and in the videos of the target building there are cookoffs, I suspect they use the thermite munitions to target weapons depot's, make a nuisance cleaning up the little fires.

Also on the subject of WP, demonizing the SAA/RUAF for it's use when US affiliated/US forces used the "illumination" shells in broad daylight as little as 2 weeks ago is kinda hypocritic.
 
How come BBC journalist Tom Dugan is saying it's the rebels with their chemical arsenal that was hit? He is based in Damascus.

He could be biased. An unfriendly western reporter in Damascus doesn't stay long. I'd rather wait for investigations (that the US et al don't want strangely) before laying the blame.
 
Eh... Nothing on Al Jazeera's website or Twitter feed, and those videos don't show Al Jazeera coverage...

Assad has used it before, though...

>Al Jazeera

Don't, that's slipping into RT, Sputnik, CNN, Al Masdar tier except with gulf state bias.
 
He could be biased. An unfriendly western reporter in Damascus doesn't stay long. I'd rather wait for investigations (that the US et al don't want strangely) before laying the blame.

Funny, because they've asked exactly that to the UN: an investigation...
 
So I'm guessing they're done with their UN investigation an acted upon the result?

No, Russia found every reason in the book to not provide the information requested for the investigation (radar data, flights plans, Air Force base inspection by UN investigators...).
 
So I'm guessing they're done with their UN investigation and acted upon the result?

I wonder how many people here so convinced about Assad's use of chemical weapons once claimed the US lied about Saddam WMDs
 
I wonder how many people here so convinced about Assad's use of chemical weapons once claimed the US lied about Saddam WMDs

Me.

The disposal of Saddam's chemical weapons was done by the French army so they knew perfectly what he had and didn't. There were long articles in the french newspapers at the time of why Saddam couldn't possibly have the weapons the US claimed. Which is why France vetoed at the UN.
 
Me.

The disposal of Saddam's chemical weapons was done by the French army so they knew perfectly what he had and didn't. There were long articles in the french newspapers at the time of why Saddam couldn't possibly have the weapons the US claimed. Which is why France vetoed at the UN.

That was not what the French president said at the time...

What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs.

Jacques Chirac
 
That was not what the French president said at the time...



Jacques Chirac

That's what the army was saying, the president was probably trying to not go too frontal with the US.
 
No, Russia found every reason in the book to not provide the information requested for the investigation (radar data, flights plans, Air Force base inspection by UN investigators...).

I can't find anything that says the same. Even then flight plans and radar data would show that there were sorties over Khan Sheikoun just like there are every other day and on every other town of significance near the N.Hama front.

Despite this Trump acted as investigator, judge, jury and executioner within 3 days of the incident don't act like they wanted a true investigation.
 
I can't find anything that says the same. Even then flight plans and radar data would show that there were sorties over Khan Sheikoun just like there are every other day and on every other town of significance near the N.Hama front.

Despite this America acted as investigator, judge, jury and executioner within 3 days of the incident don't act like they wanted a true investigation.

https://www.google.co.za/amp/www.te...pose-un-resolution-syria-chemical-attack/amp/

The draft text, seen by Reuters, says Syria's government must provide an international investigation with flight plans and logs for Tuesday, the names of all helicopter squadron commanders and provide access to air bases where investigators believe attacks using chemicals may have been launched.

https://qz.com/952742/what-russia-a...out-the-the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/

Russia and China vetoed...
 
That's what the army was saying, the president was probably trying to not go too frontal with the US.

So you claim....

France's President Jacques Chirac told Time magazine last February, "There is a problem—the probable possession of weapons of mass destruction by an uncontrollable country, Iraq. The international community is right ... in having decided Iraq should be disarmed."
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X