The Syrian Conflict Thread

The BBC admits its Syrian chemical attack reporting had serious flaws
The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) has admitted there were “serious flaws” in a Radio 4 documentary by journalist Chloe Hadjimatheou on the alleged 2018 chemical attack in the Syrian city of Douma.
On 2 September, the UK national broadcaster issued a statement which read: “The ECU found that, although they were limited to one aspect of an investigation into a complex and hotly contested subject, these points represented a failure to meet the standard of accuracy appropriate to a program of this kind.”
The ECU statement came in response to an official complaint by Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens following last November’s broadcast of “Mayday: The Canister On The Bed.”

This follows other recent investigative reports:
How a network of UK intel-linked operatives helped sell every alleged Syrian chemical weapons attack
While Western media covers up their credibility issues, these pseudo-experts and spooks have helped drive the dirty war on Syria.
A tight-knit cast of characters has sought to destabilize the Syrian government by convincing Syrians, Western citizens, foreign states, and international bodies that the CIA-backed Free Syrian Army is a legitimate, “moderate” alternative, while flooding news across the globe with opposition propaganda.
One of the most prominent among this group of self-proclaimed experts is supposed chemical weapons specialist Hamish de Bretton-Gordon. Previously Commanding Officer of the UK CBRN Regiment and NATO’s Rapid Reaction CBRN Battalion, his past deployments have included spells in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Cyprus, Kosovo, and Iraq.
Once upon a time, de Bretton Gordon’s Twitter profile identified him as a member of 77th Brigade, the British Army’s shadowy psychological warfare division, which maintains a vast militia of real, fake and automated social media accounts that it deploys to disseminate propaganda in support of UK Foreign Office objectives, and discredit government critics.
1631260838663.png
 
it was an obvious false flag from the very first news article reporting it

only question is did Trump actually fall for it or did he play along even though he knew ... either way, f-him for being just another typical US president on that day
I think it's easy to underestimate the impact of daily briefings from the Pentagon etc. - being fed a steady diet of carefully controlled information. I doubt it's much different with Biden.
Although Trump was intuitive and willing to challenge the old guard, he was also too erratic and unfocused. You would need a steely-eyed JFK-type president to see the bigger picture and attempt to reign it in systematically and intelligently...
 
Lots of action in Syria.
Israel bombed the Damascus Airport in June.
There are allegations that US soldiers are stealing oil and wheat from Syria.
Syrians are bombing US bases.
 
 
Another diabolical pack of lies comes to light in the mainstream, years later. And the West/Nato will go ...oh well. moving on.
No doubt some years from now we will learn COVID was another one of their little tricks, but it still failed to contain China
 
Another diabolical pack of lies comes to light in the mainstream, years later. And the West/Nato will go ...oh well. moving on.
No doubt some years from now we will learn COVID was another one of their little tricks, but it still failed to contain China
Lol some years from now? All the info you need is already public.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X