The facts remain...
Yes Archie, I am well aware of all this, but in spite of all this, they STILL have a published and well-documented carbon-footprint of 1.5MILLION tons per annum. If you are interested in SEARCH and RESULTS, then why don't you consider using a service that provides a virtually identical result-set, minus the carbon emissions and with an added layer of carbon-offsetting? Or does your fanboyism preclude you from entertaining any real alternatives? If so, then your banter is meaningless....
@OP -
So do all your servers come from manufacturing plants that have zero emissions? Are they carbon neutral?
Was your building constructed "green?"
What is your opinion on the google headquarters that has most of its roof covered in solar panels?
Or how about their employee transport systems, saving people from using their own cars, hence reducing emissions?
Or how they reduced oil consumption in their back up generators by 67%...
Or how they avoided buying thousands of new servers by simply retasking the old ones...
etc, etc, etc
Methinks you dont know the half of what google does to be "green" but since it competes your search engine, you are willing to ignore it
Yes Archie, I am well aware of all this, but in spite of all this, they STILL have a published and well-documented carbon-footprint of 1.5MILLION tons per annum. If you are interested in SEARCH and RESULTS, then why don't you consider using a service that provides a virtually identical result-set, minus the carbon emissions and with an added layer of carbon-offsetting? Or does your fanboyism preclude you from entertaining any real alternatives? If so, then your banter is meaningless....