I was going to post this on the forum earlier, but thought to myself that I will be dismissed as having a "chip on my shoulder". But when I read the letter sent to News24, I thought then I must not be the only one thinking of it.
The DA had to put forward a canidate, and I'm guessing they knew they did not have a chance of actually winning it, so they decided to score some political points with the black voting base.
Personally, it did nothing of the sort. IF the DA had wanted Seremane to be a President they would have elected him as leader of their party. They went with Zille, which was not a bad choice at all. And the DA then picked Sandra Botha as their "leader" in parliament. Should she not have stood against Motlhanthe? The ANC put forward their highest ranking official in parliament, so why did the DA not do the same?
I have to agree with the writer of the letter and say it was tokenism from the DA to have Seremane stand and not Botha. And if they feel that they have to do that, then it shows that they are not taking the voters seriously.
http://www.news24.com/News24/MyNews24/Letters/0,,2-2127-2129_2400084,00.html
The DA had to put forward a canidate, and I'm guessing they knew they did not have a chance of actually winning it, so they decided to score some political points with the black voting base.
Personally, it did nothing of the sort. IF the DA had wanted Seremane to be a President they would have elected him as leader of their party. They went with Zille, which was not a bad choice at all. And the DA then picked Sandra Botha as their "leader" in parliament. Should she not have stood against Motlhanthe? The ANC put forward their highest ranking official in parliament, so why did the DA not do the same?
I have to agree with the writer of the letter and say it was tokenism from the DA to have Seremane stand and not Botha. And if they feel that they have to do that, then it shows that they are not taking the voters seriously.
http://www.news24.com/News24/MyNews24/Letters/0,,2-2127-2129_2400084,00.html