Tools to recognise AI generated text and material

[RedViking]

AI Content Detector Mod for Writing Pattern Guidance | Moxby

Review writing for robotic or repetitive patterns with approximate guidance. Results can flag human text and do not verify authorship.

contentdetector.ai

Have you tried this one?

This is actually not bad!
Seeing that I did reference original content and then plagiarized it and changed the context.

 

[Neptuner]

Just ask ChatGPT....

ChatGPT already knows what he’s upto, AI already created a website for him to test his insecurities. Too late @RedViking you need to invent time travel to stop this one.

 

[RedViking]

AI Content Detector Mod for Writing Pattern Guidance | Moxby

Review writing for robotic or repetitive patterns with approximate guidance. Results can flag human text and do not verify authorship.

contentdetector.ai

Have you tried this one?

I've run another suspected wall of text through it. Personally I would have guessed 65% of it generated. But taking away the fluff I would say this is as I expected. Ha!

 

[Neptuner]

I've run another suspected wall of text through it. Personally I would have guessed 65% of it generated. But taking away the fluff I would say this is as I expected. Ha!

View attachment 1571384

It was AI who coded that probability algorithm. I bet that site had no CAPTCHA verification…

 

[konfab]

In the grim dark future, the only way you will know if text is genuine is if it is making fun of a protected class of people.

 

[animal531]

The short answer is yes there are, but they're delivering a lot of false negatives.

 

[RedViking]

The short answer is yes there are, but they're delivering a lot of false negatives.

Because none of them so far allows me to feed multiple sources of data as I have explained above. They only allow you to paste text without any context.

 

[DapperDanMan]

It was AI who coded that probability algorithm. I bet that site had no CAPTCHA verification…

For good reason.