Umalusi reveals all...almost

Nom Chompsky

High Tory
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
54,318
Reaction score
39,101
Location
Cape Town
Well this meagre bit of transparency must be applauded, they still left how the crucial element - by how much were the marks adjusted?

Source: Mail and Guardian

The English home language question papers for last year's controversial matric exams had the highest failure rates of all the home language subjects because most non-English speakers who attend former Model C schools do not have the option of choosing their mother tongue as their first language.

There were also wild inconsistencies in the levels of difficulty across exam papers in the nine African languages offered as home-language subjects.

These startling findings emerged on Wednesday this week when the state's quality watchdog body, Umalusi, finally revealed details about its controversial so-called "standardisation" of the 2010 matric exams.

Applied every year, the standardisation process this time ignited greater public scepticism than usual because of the unexpectedly huge 7,1% increase in the 2010 pass rate of 67,8% -- up from 2009's 60,7%.

Umalusi’s press conference in Pretoria on Wednesday followed a month of increasing pressure for it to reveal more details about its standardisation -- in particular the subjects in which marks were changed, by how much they had changed and what the raw marks (that is, pre-adjustment) were.

The watchdog body was also facing a court challenge mounted by City Press and Rapport in January to divulge these details.

English had the highest home language failure rates
When the 2010 results were announced on January 6, Umalusi revealed merely that it had adjusted marks in some subjects. It did not specify which subjects or the extent of mark changes.

On Wednesday, Umalusi named 19 subjects whose marks it had changed. But it stopped short of saying what the raw marks were before its standardisation processes were applied to these subjects.

The subjects in which Umalusi changed marks were:

Accounting (Upwards)
Agricultural sciences (Downwards)
Civil technology (Downwards)
Consumer studies (Upwards)
Electrical technology (Downwards)
English home language (Upwards)
English first additional language (Upwards)
Geography (Upwards)
isiXhosa first additional language (Downwards)
isiNdebele home language (Downwards)
isiZulu home language (Downwards)
Life sciences (Downwards)
Mathematics (Upwards)
Religious studies (Downwards)
seSetho home language (Upwards)
Setswana home language (Upwards)
Tshevenda home language (Upwards)
Xitsonga home language (Downwards)
Siswati home language. (Downwards)


"We have found that English home language has the highest failure rates of all home language subjects as most non-English speakers who attend former Model C schools are forced to take the subject as the schools don’t offer their mother tongue as home language subject," said Umalusi council chairperson Sizwe Mabizela at the conference. "So immediately these learners are at a disadvantage."

"Moves are also under way to ensure that all home language exams are brought up to the same level of difficulty. Currently there is just too much variability in these papers, particularly the African languages," he said.

Mabizela told the gathering that Umalusi was taking the unprecedented step of revealing its quality assurance and standardisation decisions to protect the integrity of the South African education system.

"In the absence of credible information from us, some so-called experts took the gap to peddle reckless and irresponsible commentary. Our failure to share this vital information with the public has the potential to damage the credibility of Umalusi and the qualifications which we assure," he said.

"It is in the interest of protecting our education system that we are taking this step."

Nice Zimbabwean style statement :rolleyes:

*Note: Which marks were adjusted either upwards or downwards are not in the original M&G report. In my local paper, however, they showed which subjects had been adjusted upwards or downwards
 
"In the absence of credible information from us, some so-called experts took the gap to peddle reckless and irresponsible commentary."

What is Zimbabwe style about this? I don't see anything terribly wrong with it, and I doubt they'd release a statement this coherent in Zim anyway.
 
What criteria was used to standardise

All reports I see is on the topic is so unspecific. What was used to standardise.
In http://www.umalusi.org.za/ur/publications/Umalusi - IRT Report_Final.pdf
umalusi give detailed explanation as to where they WOULD standardise so where is the report as to how/why they DID standardise. Against what criteria did they do the standardisation as there is only 2 years of comparison? Did they standardise against results (i.e. how the learners performed in higher education and the workplace) I have read reports from universities on how the standard of school leavers has decreased.
 
"In the absence of credible information from us, some so-called experts took the gap to peddle reckless and irresponsible commentary."

What is Zimbabwe style about this? I don't see anything terribly wrong with it, and I doubt they'd release a statement this coherent in Zim anyway.

It's the theme of 'those damn journalists' again. How dare they question the validity of the results?!

If Umalusi want to avoid speculation then they need to be more open about their standardisation process. Witholding information is just bad business.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X