Upgrading to an entry-level audiophile setup - Advice

Im seeing quite a few people talk about these speakers, hmm.

It’s a great all in one solution.

No need for DACs or cables or anything but the speakers, while getting top quality audio in the process.

Brand new the LT models are R23k or so without stands.
 
Every DAC adjusts the level or amplitude of specific frequencies. Your curves don't remain flat when using a DAC. For that you have disqualified yourself. This is part of the reason why "audiophiles" use EQ, unless you are speaking of something purist. Then you should also know that AMPs varies in response to frequencies. This said, there are a massive amount of different DACs/AMPs and combos.

No, you don't need to spend that much money for a decent audio experience. Being an audiophile is, in any case, a self-applied label.
You do not seem to know what a DAC (digital to analogue converter) is. You describe a graphic equaliser.

Learn more here : https://www.e-piphany.co.za/collections/shop-all-dacs

An amplifier that audibly varies in frequency response IS NOT an audiophile amp. It is a hallmark of an audiophile amp to have a very flat and neutral response. It is amongst other why they are so expensive.
 
Last edited:
How much have you done to improve the room for audio? I think that's where your best bang for buck would be.

While your current setup isn't audiophile its pretty decent for the space you have. You will spend a lot to get something you can notice the difference in a normal room.
 
Okay:


Did you also know that a DAC also has an amp?

I can tell you all about dynamic EQ. Anyway, OT.
Yes I know a bit. Been in the audiophile game since 1983. Again, an audiophile quality DAC will have as flat a frequency response as is possible to create.

My current DAC https://www.stereotimes.com/post/bel-canto-design-dac3-7/ and https://www.ebay.com/itm/186895500654 should you think to enlighten yourself about a decent DAC.
 
Last edited:
Ok just getting a feel if I’m on the right train of thought

For a AMP-

Connecting to it
Polk MXT-15 as the active left and right
Polk Powered Sub. 10” (Pre out port on the AMP)

This with some room acoustics treatment, the wall behind my setup and speakers, as well as the wall behind me will be considered to get the ideal audio experience for what I’ve listed above

Can we say this would be a step up in a better audio experience from my current setup which is:
Optical feed to the Active speakers - edifier 1280dbs
From the Edifier set it has a pre out to the active sub that has its own power source.
 
Ok just getting a feel if I’m on the right train of thought

For a AMP-

Connecting to it
Polk MXT-15 as the active left and right
Polk Powered Sub. 10” (Pre out port on the AMP)

This with some room acoustics treatment, the wall behind my setup and speakers, as well as the wall behind me will be considered to get the ideal audio experience for what I’ve listed above

Can we say this would be a step up in a better audio experience from my current setup which is:
Optical feed to the Active speakers - edifier 1280dbs
From the Edifier set it has a pre out to the active sub that has its own power source.
Are the Jamo E640 any good, found a set on Carbonite ( the other forum we dare not mention around here ;p )
 
Ok just getting a feel if I’m on the right train of thought

For a AMP-

Connecting to it
Polk MXT-15 as the active left and right
Polk Powered Sub. 10” (Pre out port on the AMP)

This with some room acoustics treatment, the wall behind my setup and speakers, as well as the wall behind me will be considered to get the ideal audio experience for what I’ve listed above

Can we say this would be a step up in a better audio experience from my current setup which is:
Optical feed to the Active speakers - edifier 1280dbs
From the Edifier set it has a pre out to the active sub that has its own power source.

Was your R7k for everything or the speakers only?

Because that’s where the KEF starts looking not all that expensive at all when you consider you don’t need anything else.
 
Ok just getting a feel if I’m on the right train of thought

For a AMP-

Connecting to it
Polk MXT-15 as the active left and right
Polk Powered Sub. 10” (Pre out port on the AMP)

This with some room acoustics treatment, the wall behind my setup and speakers, as well as the wall behind me will be considered to get the ideal audio experience for what I’ve listed above

Can we say this would be a step up in a better audio experience from my current setup which is:
Optical feed to the Active speakers - edifier 1280dbs
From the Edifier set it has a pre out to the active sub that has its own power source.
Not audiophile, but decent enough. Those Fosi digital amps are surprisingly good, and my limited experience with Polk is that they are quite good, if only it lacks a little clarity and presence for my liking, but then I am used to upper end B &W speakers. We have a Fosi amp with Mission speakers in my wife's art studio. If the sound makes your feet tap and head shake, you've made huge progress. You may not ever have the need for 'audiophile ' equipment and be quite happy with other stuff.
 
Not audiophile, but decent enough. Those Fosi digital amps are surprisingly good, and my limited experience with Polk is that they are quite good, if only it lacks a little clarity and presence for my liking, but then I am used to upper end B &W speakers. We have a Fosi amp with Mission speakers in my wife's art studio. If the sound makes your feet tap and head shake, you've made huge progress. You may not ever have the need for 'audiophile ' equipment and be quite happy with other stuff.
I’m also considering the day we meet, and you hear that kit play in the background, want you to say “ey what sounds so good, can I go have a look” :D
 
An amplifier that audibly varies in frequency response IS NOT an audiophile amp. It is a hallmark of an audiophile amp to have a very flat and neutral response. It is amongst other why they are so expensive.

I would agree with you, but since this will be my word vs your word, I will quote:


What Should an Amplifier Do?​

The perfect amplifier should take an audio signal from a source unit and increase that signal in amplitude while providing adequate current delivery to power a loudspeaker. The perfect amplifier wouldn’t add noise, change frequency response or affect anything in the time domain. However, the perfect amplifier doesn’t exist.

Amplifier Frequency Response​

The frequency response of an amplifier describes how much gain it applies to different frequencies. The perfect amplifier should amplify any signal it receives equally at all frequencies. As a generalization, they usually do well, but they aren’t perfect.

That is almost what I would have said, except that there is a whole lot more to it. It all boils down to knowing your electronics.


In layman's terms, your setup would need to be in harmony, except that we have loss, noise, etc. Though all this can be mitigated or negligible.

Today we have digital music tracks that are mastered to adhere to things like Apple's Adaptive Audio. In theory, the audio will always be at its best given the hardware used, but it is not up to standard as "audiophiles" would point out.

Personally, I consider the more 'vintage' hardware as being "audiophile" grade, and there are modernised vintage systems. New buyers like wireless hardware, and then we start to look at codecs and bitrate technologies. Then there is DSP, that no one with wireless hardware can escape. This said, some DSP applications are good, and can make 'cheap' hardware sound premium, and in high-end applications it can really give wires where there is none.

I'm no audiophile, but I do know audio, well, the engineering. It is a hobby.

There is a reason why tapes and vinyl are making a comeback, even CD, and the Walkman is coming back. Simply because it is less diluted, and people should thank IEMs.

Look, your remark isn't wrong, it is only that you can come very close to it, but then you have tracks that throws that balance and you would be pressed to EQ.

In the end, your outputs play the larger role, impedance and all that. Pairing audio hardware is like having a marriage, one that will divorce at some point in time.
 
Was your R7k for everything or the speakers only?

Because that’s where the KEF starts looking not all that expensive at all when you consider you don’t need anything else.
I have the sub

The AMP and passive speakers; this is why I’m digging around and getting input from the smart people of MyBB

The speakers can be a used set, even the amp

If it’s a bargain, then i’m in

I’m currently digging through AVforums listing
 
Not audiophile, but decent enough. Those Fosi digital amps are surprisingly good, and my limited experience with Polk is that they are quite good, if only it lacks a little clarity and presence for my liking, but then I am used to upper end B &W speakers. We have a Fosi amp with Mission speakers in my wife's art studio. If the sound makes your feet tap and head shake, you've made huge progress. You may not ever have the need for 'audiophile ' equipment and be quite happy with other stuff.
Ok alright
Getting there then, so we’re at least above my current office setup then ( regarding the above-mentioned set)
 
I would agree with you, but since this will be my word vs your word, I will quote:




That is almost what I would have said, except that there is a whole lot more to it. It all boils down to knowing your electronics.


In layman's terms, your setup would need to be in harmony, except that we have loss, noise, etc. Though all this can be mitigated or negligible.

Today we have digital music tracks that are mastered to adhere to things like Apple's Adaptive Audio. In theory, the audio will always be at its best given the hardware used, but it is not up to standard as "audiophiles" would point out.

Personally, I consider the more 'vintage' hardware as being "audiophile" grade, and there are modernised vintage systems. New buyers like wireless hardware, and then we start to look at codecs and bitrate technologies. Then there is DSP, that no one with wireless hardware can escape. This said, some DSP applications are good, and can make 'cheap' hardware sound premium, and in high-end applications it can really give wires where there is none.

I'm no audiophile, but I do know audio, well, the engineering. It is a hobby.

There is a reason why tapes and vinyl are making a comeback, even CD, and the Walkman is coming back. Simply because it is less diluted, and people should thank IEMs.

Look, your remark isn't wrong, it is only that you can come very close to it, but then you have tracks that throws that balance and you would be pressed to EQ.

In the end, your outputs play the larger role, impedance and all that. Pairing audio hardware is like having a marriage, one that will divorce at some point in time.
Ok, now you start talking my language. Marraige of components etc........people should understand that although the aim is for a perfect amp/speaker, whatever in theory, none do exist. All have shortcomings and in the combining of components often, if not mostly, lie the secret of getting the best.

We have derailed the OP's thread. I think he is getting what will serve him well, for now at least.......until the Upgraditis-bug bites.
 
As has been mention a few times it will be difficult to put together an audiophile system on this budget. Another alternative to consider is replacing those speakers with nearfield studio monitors. These are the things that musicians and people in the industry use to evaluate the music. Since musicians are normally more broke than audiophiles you typically get higher sound quality for the money from this type of equipment. The speakers tend to be amplified and can include inputs such as TRS, XLR or USB, with some also offering balanced inputs. Here are some examples: https://www.marshallmusic.co.za/product-category/studio/studio-monitors/nearfield-monitors/.

Do not expect club type thump from this type of speaker, they tend to be more on the analytical side.
 
Ok just getting a feel if I’m on the right train of thought

For a AMP-

Connecting to it
Polk MXT-15 as the active left and right
Polk Powered Sub. 10” (Pre out port on the AMP)

This with some room acoustics treatment, the wall behind my setup and speakers, as well as the wall behind me will be considered to get the ideal audio experience for what I’ve listed above

Can we say this would be a step up in a better audio experience from my current setup which is:
Optical feed to the Active speakers - edifier 1280dbs
From the Edifier set it has a pre out to the active sub that has its own power source.
I’m also considering a Fosi as my next amplifier, likely from Faith Acoustics
 
Forgot to ask, i'm guessing 14 or 16 gauge 100% copper speaker cables should suffice just fine?
100%. Although we all like to believe cables make a difference, some say it makes no difference. I could hear differences (maybe I imagined it though) between cables on systems in excess of R500k only. Lesser systems....nothing, nada. It is no biggie as long as you use some decent cabling. The volts & amps they must handle are rather low.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X