cerebus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 49,114
Can these two things not co-exist? Perhaps more accurately conservatives could describe instances of censorship (rather that the broader 'conservatives are being censored' statement), while still being popular?
Accusation by anecdote is not evidence of censorship. There's some evidence that Facebook has a pro-right wing bias
Facebook Keeps Data Secret, Letting Conservative Bias Claims Persist
Conservatives accuse Facebook of being biased against right-wing views, but engagement data tells a different story. The most popular content on Facebook, though, remains a secret.
Why the right wing has a massive advantage on Facebook
A company executive responds to claims of bias.
Facebook Is So 'Biased Against Conservatives' That Mark Zuckerberg Personally Agreed To Diminish The Reach Of 'Left-Leaning' Sites
As you well know if you’ve been reading this site for the last few years, there’s a garbage myth out there that the internet companies have an “anti-conservative” bias. Firs…
www.techdirt.com
I would suggest that these sites have no particular bias and simply drive content algorithmically. And as you say, right wing content producers are good at social media and create huge quantities of free content with bad news quality, while good quality journalism is increasingly inaccessible without paying.


