tetrasect
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 23,320
- Reaction score
- 49,900
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Now subtract useless degrees and lesbian dance theory from thoseYeah, this road ain't going where you think it is.
In 2020, the share of white Democrats with college degrees was 52% while the share of white Republicans was 33.9%.
![]()
Section 4: Scientists, Politics and Religion
Politics and science have become entangled on numerous occasions over the past several years. Conservatives have grown increasingly skeptical of the scientific evidence for human-induced climate change, even as climate…www.pewresearch.org
Nonsense, policies and practices differ much country to country. Unfortunately the US is still lagging in this regard.You'd be surprised. As for SA we're no different to countries in terms of transgender healthcare other than having limited resources especially in the public sector.
Now subtract useless degrees and lesbian dance theory from those
No wonder Dems are so keen on forgiving student debt when they rather study something pointless instead of doing actual work.
Gender studies don't count as scientists regardless.Guess you missed the part about how only 6% of scientists are republican.
Neither does hog farming.Gender studies don't count as scientists regardless.
Which is why there are almost no Republicans in science. They are not very good with facts.Luckily in real sciences ideology doesn't matter because facts don't change.
Except that it is far more useful than gender studies?Neither does hog farming.
Nah it doesn't mean what you believe it does...Which is why there are almost no Republicans in science. They are not very good with facts.
![]()
Except that it is far more useful than gender studies?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Nah it doesn't mean what you believe it does...
Sadly you can throw around as many graphs around as you want, but there's only one ideology that believes a man can become a women.
So yeah not believing in science seem to a very big issue on the Dem side![]()
The Supreme Court will soon rule on the legality of President Biden’s unilateral decision to write down $400 billion in student-loan debt. If anyone doubts why the President dodged Congress on the issue, recent votes make clear that he would have lost.
The Democratic Senate voted Thursday, 52-46, to endorse a Congressional resolution to overturn the Biden write-off. That followed a 218-203 vote in the House a week earlier to do the same.
With a wave of his hand last summer, Mr. Biden canceled $10,000 to $20,000 in debt for some 40 million borrowers, though he had earlier conceded it was “pretty questionable” that he had the power to do so. Nancy Pelosi, then House Speaker, also said two years ago that “it would take an act of Congress, not an executive order, to cancel student loan debt.”
Who cares about the law when an election is nigh? The White House claims it has sweeping authority to forgive student debt under an obscure 2003 law to help veterans, and this is the claim the High Court is judging. But Mr. Biden’s transparent political goal was to buy the votes of young people who have student debt. While the write-down might have played well in Berkeley, Calif., it rankles most Americans who didn’t go to college or who sacrificed to repay their loans.
No it's not, but thanks for trying I suppose.Science:
![]()
As @tetrasect ironically pointed out in the other post, Biden is doing this to buy votes with tax payer money.Can't wait for one of the biggest vote bribes in the history of the USA to be declared illegal by the SC! Lefties love talking about wealth transfer, but they didn't tell the public it was from working-class folks to middle and upper-class folks! The Dems remind me of the ANC: constantly acting in illegal ways until they are found guilty by courts!
Voting Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness
Wait so Biden lied about wage growth, again? Shocking I know!
Labor Hours Hourly Real hourly Unit labor
Sector productivity Output worked compensation compensation costs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonfarm business Revised 1.6 2.9 1.3 -0.7 -4.7 -2.2
Previously published 1.6 2.9 1.3 4.9 0.7 3.3
Business Revised 1.9 2.8 0.9 -0.3 -4.3 -2.2
Previously published 1.9 2.8 0.9 5.4 1.1 3.4
Nonfinancial Revised -2.1 -0.9 1.2 0.9 -3.2 3.0
corporate Previously published 0.7 1.9 1.2 5.8 1.6 5.1
Manufacturing Revised -3.2 -3.7 -0.5 -0.1 -4.1 3.2
Previously published -3.0 -3.4 -0.5 4.8 0.6 8.0
Nondurable
manufacturing Revised -2.2 -2.7 -0.5 -1.4 -5.4 0.8
Previously published -2.1 -2.6 -0.5 4.1 -0.1 6.3
Nondurable Revised -4.3 -4.7 -0.4 2.4 -1.7 6.9
manufacturing Previously published -3.9 -4.2 -0.4 6.1 1.8 10.3
edit : Don't bother to try and read this, the formatting isn't saved properly. Just open the link below and view Table B2
![]()
Second Quarter 2026, Revised - 2026 Q02 Results
www.bls.gov
Honestly horrible numbers. Inflation etc, etc..
The economy is stagnating. See the pause on the rate increase as more evidence of this.
![]()
Fed Prepares to Skip June Rate Rise but Hike Later
Two Federal Reserve officials framed a potential decision to forgo a rate increase as a chance to assess more economic information, then possibly raise rates later this summer.www.wsj.com
People returning to work after government-mandated lockdowns is not job creation you moron.
As @tetrasect ironically pointed out in the other post, Biden is doing this to buy votes with tax payer money.
Totally baseless. Lol.Ah yes the baseless temporary restraining order by the school district, which was withdrawn to avoid the court denying the motion. The baseless motion is just more potential evidence of union bad faith under the anti-SLAPP statute.
People returning to work after government-mandated lockdowns is not job creation you moron.
Expert Kieppie knows best.Nonsense, policies and practices differ much country to country. Unfortunately the US is still lagging in this regard.
Gender affirmation in the new conversion therapy![]()