<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Inevitable</i>
<br />
If we are not carefull we my damage sentech totally and then bye bye sentech and hello hellkom.You cant tell me you prefer hellkom to sentech?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Bad companies should die, regardless. Artificially keeping them alive is like rewarding their bad behaviour and they'll just carry on, then we'll be stuck with bad companies forever. We might be worse off in the short term (stuck with Telkom for a while longer), but in the longer run we will be better off if let the bad companies die and wait for better ones to spring up in their place. If we support bad companies though, and let them become big and rich and powerful, there will be no room in the market later on for better companies to edge in (e.g. look at the cellphone market). Long-term, that's worse. (I'm thinking the way telecomms licenses are issues is fundamentally flawed, even when we do 'the right thing' to create competition, we do it in a way that prevents competition from really occurring, e.g. Vodacom and MTN. The problem is we only issue one or two licenses at a time ... this just allows cartels to naturally form. The industry should be totally deregulated, with each company left to fend for itself. With dozens of competitors, competition is enforced, and truly the best companies can survive. Now you give out one license, and wait a few years while the company gets big and fat (and friendly with existing telcos). There is effectively no competition because the existing companies know that their market is protected from entry by "unknown competitors" (since no other competitors can even enter the market without another "license" being issued, a long process). If licenses were dished out like candy, then ANY company could become a competitor AT ANY TIME - to the existing telcos, that would mean competitors could "come out of nowhere" and so the existing companies would have to keep on their toes and become "paranoid" to survice. Right now, competitors can't "come out of nowhere" at all, it takes years just for a new one to get through the process of entering the market. So there is no competition "fear factor" for the existing telcos. One 'SNO' is NOT ENOUGH, and isn't going to solve our Telkom problems ... they should just toss it all up in the air and let DOZENS of telcos enter the market, and "let the best few win".)