jannievanzyl
Telecoms expert
Oh, absolutely. Standards always kill innovation and ingenuity. (Mostly for good reasonsThose computers were more personal than today's computers.
If you look at the history of home computers, from the 70's onwards, you'll see many, many different manufacturers, all with their own hardware designs, specifications, corresponding software, etc. They all had to build up their own eco-systems and support for their systems, and hobbyist communities sprang up around them with magazines, user groups, etc.
So you had (fiercely competing) groups forming, Commodore, Sinclair, Atari, Apple, Sharp, etc. and too many more to mention. 6502 vs Z80 vs 6809 vs Intel debates became near-religious in its fervor.
By the early 80's, the IBM PC architecture became popular (on the back of expandability and well published documentation) and you could see how quickly the other guys went out of business. Pretty much by 1985, the writing was on the wall and we ended up with square, beige, non-descript boxes running a standard architecture.
For me, personally, the 175 - 1985 era was thus the golden age of computing.
This site gives a nice overview of systems by year. you can click on the different years in the left pane and get a list of systems released in that year.
Last edited:
