South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
That's why you measure outcomes, not what effort was used to get to a outcome.Problem with that software is what they will see, for Example Sannie was at her PC on the work software for 3.5 hours today and Jannie for 8. Now they will scold Sannie for not working enough but what they don't consider is Sannie is done with her work, projects up to date and Jannie hasn't finished they day's stuff or worked on any of his projects.
If I'm 100% honest, I'm way more productive at home than at work. No distractions at home, and I can smoke at my Laptop...
If I'm 100% honest, I'm way more productive at home than at work. No distractions at home, and I can smoke at my Laptop...
That's why you measure outcomes, not what effort was used to get to a outcome.
That's why you measure outcomes, not what effort was used to get to a outcome.
Yeah, had management like that as well, but this is more a management issue than an employee issue.But that's not what they do, its too complex and time consuming. They just want a single figure, remember a lot of management has no damn clue what their employees do so they couldn't understand their work even if they tried.
Yeah, had management like that as well, but this is more a management issue than an employee issue.
If they don't know what the outcome should be, then they also don't know what you are supposed to be doing.
It is not difficult to look like hard worker if they only measure time spent at the office.
Actually that would be the opposite.
- I am more productive in my office than when working at home because there are many distractions at home.
- When working from home, people think that you're free to help out, and do other stuff, during the day, when you're actually supposed to be working.
- It's good to have a clear "work space" versus "relaxation space".
- To my knowledge, there's actual research that's been done on this, and open plan offices are associated with greatest productivity.