I wonder if anything is setup to work reliably?
cache-01.jhb.wbs.co.za. is served by:
ns-01.jhb.wbs.co.za. 196.30.31.200
ns-02.jhb.wbs.co.za. 196.30.31.201
Note that it must be the same LAN segment. COZA recommends (I think they now require) that it be on separate segments.
I get ns-cache-01.jhb.wbs.co.za (196.30.31.193) and
ns-cache-01.cpt.wbs.co.za (196.46.70.1) as nameservers when connecting.
These two can both resolve a domain I registered last night, they are both served by ns-01 & ns-02, as is the proxy, but the proxy still can't get the domain resolved? Somewhere there must be weird update cycles.
Note that although DNS caches are on separate segments, the primaries aren't
How in the world can they expect (and above all, force) us to ever be fully dependent on their services, referring to the SMTP as well?
smtp.wbs.co.za is also served by the same ns-01 & ns-02, probably their whole network.
cache-01.jhb.wbs.co.za. is served by:
ns-01.jhb.wbs.co.za. 196.30.31.200
ns-02.jhb.wbs.co.za. 196.30.31.201
Note that it must be the same LAN segment. COZA recommends (I think they now require) that it be on separate segments.
I get ns-cache-01.jhb.wbs.co.za (196.30.31.193) and
ns-cache-01.cpt.wbs.co.za (196.46.70.1) as nameservers when connecting.
These two can both resolve a domain I registered last night, they are both served by ns-01 & ns-02, as is the proxy, but the proxy still can't get the domain resolved? Somewhere there must be weird update cycles.
Note that although DNS caches are on separate segments, the primaries aren't
How in the world can they expect (and above all, force) us to ever be fully dependent on their services, referring to the SMTP as well?
smtp.wbs.co.za is also served by the same ns-01 & ns-02, probably their whole network.