What Happened To Pebble Bed Reactors?

Mortymoose

Honorary Master
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
13,617
Reaction score
11,762
Location
In the Namibian desert...
Am I wrong in thinking that a few short years back, I read how SA was at the forefront of Nuclear Tech with the development of Pebble Bed Nuclear power?

Am I wrong if I recalled an article that said the whole dang plant could fit into a 12m container and have the ability to power a medium size town?

What happened to this story?

:confused:
 
Am I wrong in thinking that a few short years back, I read how SA was at the forefront of Nuclear Tech with the development of Pebble Bed Nuclear power?

Am I wrong if I recalled an article that said the whole dang plant could fit into a 12m container and have the ability to power a medium size town?

What happened to this story?

:confused:

The government and its funding agencies no longer wanted to continue funding the project as it was running way over schedule and the budget was ballooning out of control if I recall correctly. So basically cost a **** load of money, with very few results. It is a pitty. I was very excited about this project. :(
 
The government and its funding agencies no longer wanted to continue funding the project as it was running way over schedule and the budget was ballooning out of control if I recall correctly. So basically cost a **** load of money, with very few results. It is a pitty. I was very excited about this project. :(

And no one else wanted it. Became infeasible.
 
The government and its funding agencies no longer wanted to continue funding the project as it was running way over schedule and the budget was ballooning out of control if I recall correctly. So basically cost a **** load of money, with very few results. It is a pitty. I was very excited about this project. :(

And we all know the government hates that kind of thing. Imagine that was going on at Medupi...............Oh...wait?
 
It began becoming an endless funding pit with little to show. I remember at one stage they realized the design was flawed too.. years into it :O I think that pretty much spelled the end of it
 
And no one else wanted it. Became infeasible.

Nope. The Chinese broke into Pelindaba, shooting a guard in the process, and stole all the research - allegedly. Gave their project a 10 year boost. But it seems the design runs a bit too hot for power generation. Its more feasible as a industrial heat source for desalination, hydrogen production or stuff like that.
 
Nope. The Chinese broke into Pelindaba, shooting a guard in the process, and stole all the research - allegedly. Gave their project a 10 year boost. But it seems the design runs a bit too hot for power generation. Its more feasible as a industrial heat source for desalination, hydrogen production or stuff like that.

Source...?
 
As I understood it, French and US nuclear scientists proved thst the concept was flawed and unfeasible back in the late 80's to early 90's.

It became the ANC's "Look at us, we too can do meaningful nuclear research just like the apartheid government did." pet project.

We never could prove Western Scientists wrong and billions later everyone quietly gave up, took the idea to the back of the shed and put a bullet into its brain.
 
Last edited:
From Wikipedia

In 2008, a report[12][13] about safety aspects of the AVR reactor in Germany and some general features of pebble-bed reactors have drawn attention. The claims are under contention.[14] Main points of discussion are

1. No possibility to place standard measurement equipment in the pebble-bed core, i.e. pebble bed = black box
2. Contamination of the cooling circuit with metallic fission products (Sr-90, Cs-137) due to the insufficient retention capabilities of fuel pebbles for metallic fission products. Even modern fuel elements do not sufficiently retain strontium and cesium.
3. improper temperatures in the core (more than 200 °C above calculated values)
4. necessity of a pressure retaining containment
5. unresolved problems with dust formation by pebble friction (dust acts as a mobile fission product carrier)

Rainer Moormann, author of the report, requests for safety reasons a limitation of average hot Helium temperatures to 800 °C minus the uncertainty of the core temperatures (which is at present at about 200 °C).

The pebble-bed reactor has an advantage over traditional reactors in that the gases do not dissolve contaminants or absorb neutrons as water does, so the core has less in the way of radioactive fluids. However, the pebbles generate graphite particulates that can blow through the coolant loop and will absorb fission products if fission products escape the TRISO particles.

No containment vessel, and large amounts of graphite... Now why does that sound so familiar?

cher-1.jpg
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X