Fulcrum29
Honorary Master
I support this, the more ecosystems the better, but I really hope that Epic can do the public good with their 'monopoly' case against Apple and Google. I always support companies having their own ecosystems, because it removes the tape and it has always been an issue I had with Steam (or Steamworks per se), but publishers and developers moved on though through criticism as many loves the big G in their mouths. However, these ecosystems must, though closed, allow others to compete on the same device.
I wouldn't mind having HarmonyOS, but I would also like Google Services to run on the same device, though both ecosystems may be contained in their own respect. Likewise with Apple, etc. As said in a previous thread, I am invested in the Google ecosystem, it is not a possibility to abandon ship which is the same gripe I have with other subscription based services (they do pursue models to lock their users in).
Consumers have to bent over to live by commercial rules, everyone can do with more openness, accessibility and use.
People cry about China and Russia spying on them, the West spies as much as the East. Propaganda isn't limited to Eastern ideologies.
I wouldn't mind having HarmonyOS, but I would also like Google Services to run on the same device, though both ecosystems may be contained in their own respect. Likewise with Apple, etc. As said in a previous thread, I am invested in the Google ecosystem, it is not a possibility to abandon ship which is the same gripe I have with other subscription based services (they do pursue models to lock their users in).
Consumers have to bent over to live by commercial rules, everyone can do with more openness, accessibility and use.
People cry about China and Russia spying on them, the West spies as much as the East. Propaganda isn't limited to Eastern ideologies.