Whatsapp - Why we don't sell ads

Azbubu

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
38,494
Reaction score
17,464
Location
Kapkaupunki
http://blog.whatsapp.com/index.php/2012/06/why-we-dont-sell-ads

Brian and I spent a combined 20 years at Yahoo, working hard to keep the site working. And yes, working hard to sell ads, because that’s what Yahoo did. It gathered data and it served pages and it sold ads.

We watched Yahoo get eclipsed in size and reach by Google… a more efficient and more profitable ad seller. They knew what you were searching for, so they could gather your data more efficiently and sell better ads.

These days companies know literally everything about you, your friends, your interests, and they use it all to sell ads.

When we sat down to start our own thing together three years ago we wanted to make something that wasn’t just another ad clearinghouse. We wanted to spend our time building a service people wanted to use because it worked and saved them money and made their lives better in a small way. We knew that we could charge people directly if we could do all those things. We knew we could do what most people aim to do every day: avoid ads.

No one wakes up excited to see more advertising, no one goes to sleep thinking about the ads they’ll see tomorrow. We know people go to sleep excited about who they chatted with that day (and disappointed about who they didn’t). We want WhatsApp to be the product that keeps you awake… and that you reach for in the morning. No one jumps up from a nap and runs to see an advertisement.

Advertising isn’t just the disruption of aesthetics, the insults to your intelligence and the interruption of your train of thought. At every company that sells ads, a significant portion of their engineering team spends their day tuning data mining, writing better code to collect all your personal data, upgrading the servers that hold all the data and making sure it’s all being logged and collated and sliced and packaged and shipped out… And at the end of the day the result of it all is a slightly different advertising banner in your browser or on your mobile screen.

Remember, when advertising is involved you the user are the product.

At WhatsApp, our engineers spend all their time fixing bugs, adding new features and ironing out all the little intricacies in our task of bringing rich, affordable, reliable messaging to every phone in the world. That’s our product and that’s our passion. Your data isn’t even in the picture. We are simply not interested in any of it.

When people ask us why we charge for WhatsApp, we say “Have you considered the alternative?”
 
Providing a service and keeping it affordable to the masses is the secret.

I have more respect for these guys after reading this.
 
It sounds great. I just don't see a profitable business model here.
 
Think I'll shell out for my year's subscription after reading that.
 
They haven't charged me yet? How come mine is free?

I've also been using mine for about 3 years and the free trial keeps getting extended, but there's an option to pay anyway and after reading the OP that's exactly what I'll be doing. I hate ads.
 
People are leaving BBM for Whatsapp. You have the option to block people if you don't like them too.

So I'm happy. Best chat app so far. So I don't mind paying the 99c per year subscription. (US iTunes store)
 
They charge for it directly. Personally I reckon a good ad-free messaging service is worth ... say $2-5 a year subscription.

Agree. Don't mind paying at all, just don't see real profits from such low subscriptions once a year. Maybe the plan is to capture as many as possible and then have higher subscription options for value added services.
 
I actually want to pay them more, but since I bought a WhatsApp subscription from the iStore, mine is paid up until 2022!

Would happily pay them yearly, cos I use WhatsApp a lot, even group discussions.
 
It sounds great. I just don't see a profitable business model here.

You mean 100's of millions of users times $1 per year is not a good business model? Remember that an individual user uses almost no data or server time. If each message uses 1 kilobyte of data then a 1 Meg pipe could service 1024 users per second. The value is in the simplicity and the huge market share that they have, the actual technology they are using is positively ancient.
 
Last edited:
You mean 100's of millions of users times $1 per year is not a good business model? Remember that an individual user uses almost no data or server time. If each message uses 1 kilobyte of data then a 1 Meg pipe could service 1024 users per second. The value is in the simplicity and the huge market share that they have, the actual technology they are using is positively ancient.

Understood, but it is so easy to copy and take away their business. Facebook is doing exactly that now in several countries incl SA. It's a business model that can easily collapse. They need more meat and fat on the skeleton. They need something different that is protected by patents.
 
Understood, but it is so easy to copy and take away their business. Facebook is doing exactly that now in several countries incl SA. It's a business model that can easily collapse. They need more meat and fat on the skeleton. They need something different that is protected by patents.

I thought I read yesterday somewhere that Facebook is in talks to buy Whatsapp??? What will become of the no-add thing then?

EDIT: OK, little bit of searching and it seems like a rumour gone bad.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X