Lupus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2006
- Messages
- 91,458
- Reaction score
- 62,055
Exactly, the only reason that French cars got their reputation is due to the 60s and 70s when they were trying different things and trying to be more advanced, which lead to failures and the average mechanic not being able to fix it.Yep, scooby flat four. Subaru being renowned for reliability.
After getting it back, I immediately traded it in for an 'unreliable' French Megane GT, which never gave me a single issue in 6 years. Not even a rattle. Was so impressed with the build quality and reliability that I traded that in last year for an RS, which also hasn't had an issue so far.
The point being that these stories about certain brands being more reliable are now just stories. You need to have yourself covered through a warranty. Buying Japanese/German because of reliability means squat when you're on the side of the road...
I mean even my step dads Laguna had electric seats and various other features that were pretty complex for the average 90s car so when those broke it was harder to fix, the actual engine and other things needed to keep a car running didn't give any issues.
I've known people with Peugots, Citroens and Renaults that are hitting 24 years old now and still going strong, with just services. Can't actually say the same for people with other brands as they traded them in when they started giving trouble. The only issue with Citroen is the wet belt on a few models, but that would be an issue on Fords as well.
So yeah same as the French are cheese eating surrender monkeys, French cars being more unreliable than any other brand is a myth
But you'll have some users who will jump up and down that French sucks, then they point to Romanian or Indian versions of those cars.
