Wynsam do you maybe recomend the Renaissance? They cover 300%. Some advice would be great from you as I think you have your finger on the pulse. Excuse the pun
No we don't. One of our criteria is that schemes should meet the required solvency. In the last audited figures that we have access to they were at 16.2%, granted up from 11% so the trend is good. This is lower than the 25% required by law. This means simply that they will have to charge higher premiums than their peer competitors would have too, all other things being equal( that statement is a huge simplification but it still stands) to be able to grow to 25%.
A worry is that the scheme lost 9% of their members. That too high and indicative of issues. The loss would also explain the increase in solvency. So far not a rosy picture.
I think their nett non-health care costs are also too high-- this the amount they spend on admin advertising, and all the other things except your health. Their cost ratio is higher than average. Average for the industry is 16.1% they are at 21.6%, so in my view they are wasting members money( remeber that the scheme belongs to members- they charge fees to the scheme for their services)
So to sum up I think their could be better ways to spend your medical aid money.
Last edited: