Would you trust a driverless car?

Creag

The Boar's Rock
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
46,404
Reaction score
8,957
Location
Joburg
http://www.iol.co.za/motoring/industry-news/would-you-trust-a-driverless-car-1.1518794#.UZsWGNi7_lc

Electronics company Cisco - which, let us not forget, has a vested interest in pushing the adoption of new technology - has released the results of a customer experience report based on a survey of 1500 drivers across 10 countries.

The question were focused on the car buying and driving experience, technology preferences, trust in future automotive innovation and how car manufacturers can use those preferences to provdidec a more personal driving experience.

From buying a car to servicing, customers are using more advanced communications technologies - cellphones, texting, interactive websites etc. - to deal with manufacturers and dealers. About half (47 percent) take the reputation of a brand for being technology-savvy into account when choosing a car.

RESEARCHING THE WEB

Drivers around the world are keen to see technology-driven advances in personalising their car, safety, and time and cost savings; drivers in Brazil, China and India were the most willing to provide information in their driving habits to save time and money, and would probably be more receptive to driverless cars.

Most customers begin the process of buying a car online: 83 percent of buyers worldwide prefer to do their research online rather than walk into a dealership and ask questions. Conversely, car salespeople need to realise that five out of six customers now know as much as - or more than - they do about their product before they even shake hands.

The good news, however, is that 61 percent of them will actually go to the manufacturer's website for primary information, and 78 percent of them trust what they see online.

TRACKING COSTS

Car drivers, it seems, want to be able to track costs from their vehicles - lowest insurance premiums, availability of roadside assistance, recall information - but the highest percentage of respondents (52 percent) wanted to know where they could get the lowest fuel price, underlining the fact that South Africa is unusual in having regulated fuel prices.

Even more (62) percent said they would buy a device that could keep track in real time of their monthly fuel and maintenance budgets. And 74 percent would allow their driving habits to be monitored to save on insurance or servicing costs.

Sixty percent were happy to provide fingerprints or DNA samples for personalised car security (now that's a scary thought!) and 65 percent would share personal information such as height or weight, driving habits and entertainment preferences if this meant they could get a more personalised car.

AND FINALLY

More than half of the drivers polled (57 percent) said they would be prepared to ride in an autonomous car, especially Brazilians (96 percent) Indians (86 percent) and Chinese drivers (70 percent). But consumer trust dropped to 46 percent when asked if they would let their kids ride in driverless cars, in particular drivers Japan, France, and Germany, where only six percent would let their children ride in an autonomous car.
 
Yes, they are more reliable than human controlled cars. Well especially the Google ones. People drive so badly and dont realize it. The world seriously needs this.
 
As we've seen with the runaway Toyota's we are no longer have full control anyway so you might as well sit back and enjoy the drive.

Or like that joke:
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa not screaming like his passengers.
 
I'd trust a driverless car more than most drivers. I'd love to have a driverless car. Imagine you can read a book or watch a movie or catch an extra few minutes sleep while commuting. Long distance trips will be even better! Drive overnight and have a nice sleep. The only thing is that all vehicles will have to be driverless; human drivers are just too unpredictable.
 
The problem really is that for this to work seamlessly EVERYONE would need to have an autonomous car, or at the very least a car that can communicate with all the others around it and therefore be able to protect itself from other cars/drivers.

My second worry as a petrolhead is where does the nanny-state notion come into it. Will I soon not be able to get up to high jinx with my car because some electronic system overrides me and deems it inappropriate?


I would love to put my car into auto-pilot mode on the way to work and go on about life with my laptop or tablet or whatever, traffic isn't really driving after all, but I would still prefer to have complete freedom to drive myself when I so choose.

As kingrob points out regarding drinking, this would be one way of solving that problem and would be no different than taking a taxi.



However the thing that I'm wondering about is how would people feel about a car with NO PERSON INSIDE? I'm thinking specifically here about how life changing it could be if you "send" your kids to school in the car while you go about other stuff and the car drives itself back to pick you up before going to work for instance.


What would the legislative drama be around a car with no driver being involved in an accident for instance? Or do we simply assume that accidents become impossible? Again that could only happen if every car on the road conforms to some autonomous standard.
 
I'd trust a driverless car more than most drivers. I'd love to have a driverless car. Imagine you can read a book or watch a movie or catch an extra few minutes sleep while commuting. Long distance trips will be even better! Drive overnight and have a nice sleep. The only thing is that all vehicles will have to be driverless; human drivers are just too unpredictable.
I would probably -- with the highlight above being the only condtion.
 
I would probably -- with the highlight above being the only condtion.

Well it's not really necessary for all the other cars to be driverless, they simply need to be aware of all other cars.

If a driver is incapable of crashing into another car because the car itself prevents it then it doesn't really matter if there are real drivers or not.

It could be semi-autonomous.
 
The problem really is that for this to work seamlessly EVERYONE would need to have an autonomous car, or at the very least a car that can communicate with all the others around it and therefore be able to protect itself from other cars/drivers..

No, it doesnt have to communicate with all other cars, it just has to see them. Google are already beyond this point.
 
No, it doesnt have to communicate with all other cars, it just has to see them. Google are already beyond this point.

Uhm...the other car can't magically not crash into you no matter what your own car does.

Therefore the other car needs to be aware of your car so that it can put it's own safety measures in place like auto-braking or steering to prevent the "real" driver of that car from crashing into yours.

Therefore if all the cars on the road are aware of each other whether by direct communication like Mercedes is attempting or aware by other means it becomes impossible to crash into each other.

"Seeing" in the conventional sense doesn't necessarily work the same as high speeds can override the ability of one car to "see" another, not to mention inclines/declines etc.

They need to "see" each other by different means than optics.
 
Last edited:
not a chance,

you will get the guy in a back yard in brakpan who will inevitably try to fix it himself when it breaks, or "tune it"
 
not a chance,

you will get the guy in a back yard in brakpan who will inevitably try to fix it himself when it breaks, or "tune it"

So too said Clarkson.

I think he referrred to a Brian or Ken fixing it up in his shed :p
 
Uhm...the other car can't magically not crash into you no matter what your own car does.

Therefore the other car needs to be aware of your car so that it can put it's own safety measures in place like auto-braking or steering to prevent the "real" driver of that car from crashing into yours.

Therefore if all the cars on the road are aware of each other whether by direct communication like Mercedes is attempting or aware by other means it becomes impossible to crash into each other.

"Seeing" in the conventional sense doesn't necessarily work the same as high speeds can override the ability of one car to "see" another, not to mention inclines/declines etc.

They need to "see" each other by different means than optics.

No one said they do it magically. Thats just you using a logical fallacy and building a strawman. The Google cars have sensors that pick up the speed and distance of other cars and react accordingly. No ways all cars are ganna communicate with each other. lol. Good luck on getting all vendors to do that. Right now I think based on tried and tested technology, the current system works well :) Expecially considering for a time many cars on the road will not be driver-less .

No one mentioned optics to "see" each other. There are many sensor technologies that dont require eyeballs. Lol.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X