Your AI-generated Art

shaggy_beef_on_a_tricycle said:
You only realise how bad it actually is, is when you use something like Stable Diffusion which has no filters. Just asking it to generate a tree will probably return an image which will be burned into your eye socket for a lifetime. have to make sure you use those Negative Promts on everything.
Click to expand...
Oh, the things I've seen... I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror...
 
OIG.SI6UP8pGjh1K1DoHjz1h
 
This is an image generated with Bing Image Creator. I had very little control over the process (yes, that is my mouse, lol):
1700688629026.png

I then reproduced the image, spending an hour or so in Stable Diffusion to match 80% of what I want. The setting, the background, the mood etc.
1700688880851.png
1700688775352.png
1700689007728.png
I am going to make a statement here:

AI is art. Where you are the director, and knowledge is the artist.
 
shaggy_beef_on_a_tricycle said:
AI is art. Where you are the director, and knowledge is the artist.
Click to expand...
I agree, the way I see it, AI is a tool much like a camera is a tool to capture "art". Hardcore (old school) photographers might complain that using modern cameras and smartphones isn't photography, much like many current illustrators \ concept artist protest against AI or AI-assisted art. I say, all of it is art... they can all co-exist. There is no need to burn people (or machines) at the stake for this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X