Port Elizabeth - South Africa has so far had less exposure to China than other African countries, but if Jacob Zuma becomes president greater emphasis could be placed on relations with the East.
Thabo Mbeki, who on Sunday announced his resignation as president, has always been mistrustful of the Chinese and their possible exploitation of Africa, but Zuma seems better disposed towards the Chinese, says Daniel Silke, an independent political analyst.
China's interest in Africa is becoming ever more evident with the burgeoning global demand for scarce raw materials, resources and commodities, Silke told the Master Builders of South Africa convention on Monday.
The Chinese enter into raw material transactions with different countries in exchange for thousands upon thousands of dollars' worth of infrastructure.
According to Silke, the Chinese impose no conditions in regard to political or other reforms on these countries.
Just as important as the role emerging economies occupy in anyone's future planning is the grading of companies and countries by rating agencies.
Yesterday's warning from international rating agency Moody's that South Africa should not diverge from its economic course in the current political turmoil indicates the authority these institutions wield, says Silke.
Money power shifting
He considers it unlikely that South Africa would adopt a different economic course since this would have massive consequences for the country.
The Russian stock exchange, for example, recently fell 50%, which can be partly ascribed to its invasion of Georgia.
The world's emerging markets are creating a new group of consumers who will have a significant influence on brands and retail sales in the future, added Silke.
India is already the world's eighth largest retail market - and half its inhabitants are younger than 25.
Another question that arises is who the future world powers will be. Silke reckons it's no longer a question merely of greater military or political power, but also one of economic power.
If one compares China's $1650bn in foreign reserves with the US's $62bn, the direction in which money power is shifting is clear.
View it as however you wish.
But I don't like the idea