Samsung Avoids Apple injuction in Germany

This could get very messy and will probably play nicely into Apple's (lawyers) hands. I think its bullshirt that Samsung has been allowed to get away with their copycat crap for so long anyway.
 
Hmm, very naughty of Apple and Samsung to copy the tablets out of the 1968 movie, "2001 : A Space Oddysey".
 
Last edited:
Good for Samsung.

The less these companies sue each other, the better for the consumer. Apple should just make peace with the fact that they don't own the idea of a tablet.
 
Its not that they want to be the only tablet, its that Android blatantly copied their design, even down to the look of the icons. Very off-side in my book.
 
Its not that they want to be the only tablet, its that Android blatantly copied their design, even down to the look of the icons. Very off-side in my book.

And the bastards stole "copy and paste" from Apple as well.

What will they steal next?
Bluetooth file sharing???
 
Its not that they want to be the only tablet, its that Samsung copied a universal design, even down to the look of the icons. Very off-side in my book.

FIFY

Oh and Samsung ≠ Android as they have Bada and other phones as well.

Just to add, Apple done their fair share of coping as well, just ask Xerox among other things.
 
FIFY

Oh and Samsung ≠ Android as they have Bada and other phones as well.

Just to add, Apple done their fair share of coping as well, just ask Xerox among other things.

Dude I've used Samsung phones since the Omnia(windows 6.1), it is no secret that Samsung has copied Apple. After using Omnia I went and bought the Galaxy S. There is a big difference from the way Samsung packaged their phones before the Galaxy S, you could see where they got the idea from.

The Galaxy Tab 7" was quite different, but from the packaging and USB cable, you could tell where Samsung got its motivation from. What about the Touchwiz?

Other android makers have innovated and differentiated their products, why couldn't Samsung do the same? A good example of those companies is HTC.

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2011/09/samsung-copying-cjr.jpg
 
Dude I've used Samsung phones since the Omnia(windows 6.1), it is no secret that Samsung has copied Apple. After using Omnia I went and bought the Galaxy S. There is a big difference from the way Samsung packaged their phones before the Galaxy S, you could see where they got the idea from.

The Galaxy Tab 7" was quite different, but from the packaging and USB cable, you could tell where Samsung got its motivation from. What about the Touchwiz?

Other android makers have innovated and differentiated their products, why couldn't Samsung do the same? A good example of those companies is HTC.

Thats why I pointed out Samsung and not Android, and the reason I said universal is all the examples can be found in other devices not only phones, like the USB power plug or the box, as for the icons they all draw from iconic ideas thats what make them erm iconic I guess. Like I phone icon to symbolize pick-up and a microphone symbolize something that records. Next thing you going to tell me using an image of a torch to picture a portable light is unique to a certain manufacturer.

Sure Samsung should have done more effort to look a bit different that I do not argue but as the court decided in this case they only needed to change 4 icons and add a thicker silver band I guess we can let it rest.
 
How would you like it if you were the inventor of something and a big bully came along, stole your design and started selling more product than you?

I hope Samsung gets clobbered with this. I really do. They innovate nothing in this regard.
 
How would you like it if you were the inventor of something and a big bully came along, stole your design and started selling more product than you?

I hope Samsung gets clobbered with this. I really do. They innovate nothing in this regard.

That would have been ok if tablets was a new invention which unfortunately they where not, tablets been around since 2000.

Remember the case here is about design patents nothing else and the only reason they exist is to protect the consumer. Its there so you dont get fooled into buying the wrong product. In this case I dont think anyone would buy a Samsung tablet thinking it was an iPad or a Galaxy phone thinking it was an iPhone, so it kind of make the whole argument mute.
 

I have seen this before. Do you know if the plugs, cables, etc are standard in other countries or not? For example: Here is a pic of another similar device.

thumb_e004-ip398w-usb-power-adapter-in-box-for-iphone-3g-3gs-white-69228_810.jpg


How about the HTC box below? Similar to apple? I am sure other companies have put their product picture on the box before.

images
 
Its not that they want to be the only tablet, its that Android blatantly copied their design, even down to the look of the icons. Very off-side in my book.

You realise that Android was around way before iOS?
 
What?

Android was released in sept 08 and iPhone OS in June 2007 if I remember correctly.

You know they don't write software in a month or 2?

Android is a Linux based operating system for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablet computers. It is developed by the Open Handset Alliance led by Google.

Google purchased the initial developer of the software, Android Inc., in 2005. The unveiling of the Android distribution in 2007 was announced with the founding of the Open Handset Alliance, a consortium of 84 hardware, software, and telecommunication companies devoted to advancing open standards for mobile devices.Google releases the Android code as open-source, under the Apache License. The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) is tasked with the maintenance and further development of Android.

Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)
 
So apple coded iPhone OS in a month or two, you think? :-P
 
Depends what you mean by "around". Also Android devices were basically looking like blackberry until iPhone arrived.
 
So apple coded iPhone OS in a month or two, you think? :-P

No but we can not say when they started as Apple is a company that can keep a secret* unlike Google where everyone knew it was coming. Unless you say Google spied on the iOS dev team?

Depends what you mean by "around". Also Android devices were basically looking like blackberry until iPhone arrived.

No they did not. There where 2 UI's and if you go check out the 1st beta code you will see both in it. The OEM's went with the touch screen UI and did not produce devices with the BB like onse, there I can not argue that the OEM's thought it better to opt for the iOS'es look instead of the BB one.

*Unless the developer was drunk and left a dev phone on a bar stool.
 
Last edited:
No but we can not say when they started as Apple is a company that can keep a secret* unlike Google where everyone knew it was coming. Unless you say Google spied on the iOS dev team?
Well Eric Schmidt was on the board of Apple ...

No they did not. There where 2 UI's and if you go check out the 1st beta code you will see both in it. The OEM's went with the touch screen UI and did not produce devices with the BB like onse, there I can not argue that the OEM's thought it better to opt for the iOS'es look instead of the BB one.
I'll go check it out.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X