Cosatu man resigns from top post over R21 rebuild

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,432
Reaction score
9,947
Location
District 9
http://www.ewn.co.za/Story.aspx?Id=85854

Collin Matjila, the chairperson of construction company Raubex and the chief execuive of the Congress of South African Trade Unions’ (Cosatu) investment arm, resigned from Raubex on Tuesday because of a perceived conflict of interest, the firm said.
Matjila tendered his resignation after it emerged that Cosatu's Kopano Ke Matla owned shares in Raubex, a company involved in the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP).
In a notice to shareholders Raubex said that Matjila thought it appropriate to stand down to prevent any perceived conflict of interest.
The board plans to appoint a new chairperson at a meeting in Centurion in May.
Raubex won a tender to build the R21 as part of the GFIP.
Motorists will have to pay toll fees to pay for construction.
Cosatu has been at the forefront of opposition against the implementation of tolling.
This week General-Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi said the trade union federation did not know the e-Toll system would fund the road construction project.

Well done Cosatu! Government should take note of how to properly deal with conflicts of interest!
 
Did the guy not use his status in Cosatu to land the big contract in the first place?

Conflict of interest was already in place when he would have taken up reigns as Chairperson of contruction company bidding on tenders......
 
Please give me that man's address. That f0ked up road has cost me 6 tires and a set of new rims ( that syt hole they are digging up again and want to farking toll me for )
 
Wait... Cosatu "didn't know" meanwhile their CEO of the investment arm was chairman of the company that got the contract...

Somebody find that lying sack of schit from Cosatu and shoot him.
 
WRONG.

Not well done. Only done when it became public knowledge!

You mean as opposed to the government, who when it becomes public knowledge still deny it, call the person who uncovered it a racist, and introduce legislation in Parliament to make sure that other embarrassments never come to light under pain of imprisonment?
 
You mean as opposed to the government, who when it becomes public knowledge still deny it, call the person who uncovered it a racist, and introduce legislation in Parliament to make sure that other embarrassments never come to light under pain of imprisonment?

Ok... Better done, but still not well done as the conflict of interest should never have been allowed in the first place.
 
Ok... Better done, but still not well done as the conflict of interest should never have been allowed in the first place.

I agree... but now that it has been brought to light the response was swift.
That is refreshing to see... for a change.
 
Ok... Better done, but still not well done as the conflict of interest should never have been allowed in the first place.
Sure but this is more in line with what happens in the rest of the world. If somebody is caught with their pants down, they resign. I'll commend him on that.
 
Raubex ?!?!!?

Are they responsible for the sh3ttest constructed road ever in the country?

3x newly relaid tar in 6 months, and still not finished. ja ne...
 
Did the guy not use his status in Cosatu to land the big contract in the first place?

Conflict of interest was already in place when he would have taken up reigns as Chairperson of contruction company bidding on tenders......

:erm: Cosatu is a union, they don't give tenders...:confused:
The conflict of interest is around the fact that COSATU is at the forefront of opposition against the implementation of e-tolling and Raubex won a tender to build the R21 as part of the GFIP (which is being funded by e-tolling).
 
Was on the R21 recently.

After Engen (towards ORT) there's sections which need to be re-tarred.

:wtf:

I think it reflects very poor on the contractor... and that shortcuts was taken.
 
I agree... but now that it has been brought to light the response was swift.
That is refreshing to see... for a change.

Agreed.
It might not be perfect but if you really think about it... having a situation like this and showing how to deal with it might even be better than not "setting the example" in the first place.
I'll take it. (Moral conclusion vs. real world influence)
 
Where does he make the most money?

As the chief executive of the COSATU investment arm (why does a trade union need to invest ... to whom do the dividends go?) ...

... Or as the chairperson of the construction company.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Um, to the members?

Does it really? I've seen COSATU executive members driving some very fancy cars and living in some very fancy houses.

Shouldn't a trade union set membership fees of low-level workers to just enough for the union to properly represent the members?

A trade union isn't suppose to act as an investment fund.
 
Does it really? I've seen COSATU executive members driving some very fancy cars and living in some very fancy houses.

Shouldn't a trade union set membership fees of low-level workers to just enough for the union to properly represent the members?

A trade union isn't suppose to act as an investment fund.

Why not? There's no law against it.
 
I'm not about what can or can not.

I'm talking about what should and should not.

Why shouldn't the members of a collective appoint someone to invest their membership funds with a view to increasing their returns on their money?
It's a sound financial strategy.
 
Cosatu tells tall tales on e-tolling

Then there is this.....

http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/cosatu-tells-tall-tales-on-e-tolling-1.1270709

The resignation of Collin Matjila, the chief executive of Cosatu’s investment arm, Kopano Ke Matla, as the non-executive chairman of Raubex, has exposed the labour federation’s deception in claiming it had no knowledge of the e-tolls.

Kopano is a 3 percent shareholder in Raubex, the construction company that won a tender to build the R800 million R21 as part of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project.

However, Cosatu recently championed a vociferous and widespread protest objecting to paying the tolls, opposing the government’s insistence that tolling will proceed.

Matjila resigned from Raubex on Tuesday, saying he believed it was appropriate to stand down to prevent any perceived conflict of interest, considering the company’s involvement in projects to privatise national roads.

Last week, Cosatu general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi said Matjila had informed the federation of the possible conflict of interest only when he was contacted last week.

But it seems Cosatu is engaged in double speak when it says it did not know that Kopano was involved in e-tolling projects. The SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) advertised for tenders for the upgrading and/or construction of national roads in and around Tshwane, Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni as early as August 2008.

The advert clearly stated: “The improved road network will be tolled using Open Road Tolling (free flow tolling without any physical lane separation or hindrance). It is envisaged that tolling of the first phase of 185kms, using 42 toll points (gantries) and generating in excess of 2 million tolling point passages per day, will commence in the last quarter of 2010, followed by future phases thereafter, as determined by Sanral.”

The advert said Sanral was inviting applications from suitable qualified and experienced applicants – companies, joint ventures, consortiums or partnerships – that met the prequalification requirements and evaluation criteria to prequalify for one or more of the packages as defined in the preqalification documentation.

Prequalified applicants would be invited and permitted to participate in the tender process that would follow the prequalification process.

The advert said a compulsory clarification meeting would be held on August 28, 2008 at 10am at Sanral’s corporate offices in Pretoria. Non-attendance at the meeting would disqualify the applicant.

The advert was also posted on tollinfo.wordpress.com.

Yesterday, Solly Phetoe, the Cosatu North West secretary, issued a statement in which he said the labour federation in the province was disturbed by the poor journalism seen in City Press on the issue of Kopano and Raubex regarding the construction of the R21.

He said Cosatu wanted to put into correct perspective for all the people of South Africa, that when the infrastructure in Gauteng and other World Cup hosting towns was improved, it was said that the funding for such projects would come from the World Cup Benefit Fund, and that nothing was said about the tolling of the roads.

“Cosatu wants to also highlight that the SABC has reported that in the documents that Raubex received for tendering, there is nothing said about the tolling of the roads, information which City Press has chosen to ignore.

“In our view, this is bad journalism, as journalists must find all facts before going to print and not just print one side,” Phetoe said.

Patrick Craven, the spokesman for Cosatu, was not available for comment. - Wiseman Khuzwayo

Look, we all knew about the tolls going way back.... but back then we though the tolling system was going to be REASONABLE.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X