VodaCom has already set precident when their network went down previously, which put into question the stability of their network design.
Interestingly enough, they were very cavalier and hasty to dish out blame, without having first established the actual cause of the problem. At this point all they can say is that severing the link with Cell C fixed the problem.
We have a tiny IP network consisting of a few IP links to other PABX's.
A screwy PABX forwarding schema is able to bring itself down when (user coaxing involved) incoming calls are forwarded to another unit which in turns redirects back to the original box thereby overloading the source unit.
In VCom/Cell C terms.
Imagine vodacom receiving incoming 082 calls, inadvertantly routing them to Cell C due to a misconfiguration and Cell C returning the route to VodaCom.
We overload the Vodacom system, now VodaCom drops the line to Cell C, suddenly everything works again... why... because the incorrect routing has been flushed.
I'm not saying this is the case, but it's not inconceivable... Vodacom has already proven that they are not 100% stable.
D