Munich council: To hell with Linux, we're going full Windows in 2020

Rouxenator

Dank meme lord
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
46,376
Reaction score
22,389
Location
Stellenbosch
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/13/munich_committee_says_all_windows_2020/

Munich city council's administrative and personnel committee has decided to move any remaining Linux systems to Windows 10 in 2020.

A coalition of Social Democrats and Conservatives on the committee voted (PDF, in Deutsche, natürlich) for the Windows migration on Wednesday, Social Democrat councillor Anne Hübner told The Register.

Munich rose to fame in the open-source world for deciding to use Linux and LibreOffice to make the city independent from the claws of Microsoft. But the plan was never fully realised – mail servers, for instance, eventually wound up migrating to Microsoft Exchange – and in February the city council formally voted to end Linux migration and go back to Microsoft.

Hübner said the city has struggled with LiMux adoption. "Users were unhappy and software essential for the public sector is mostly only available for Windows," she said.

She estimated about half of the 800 or so total programs needed don't run on Linux and "many others need a lot of effort and workarounds".

Hübner added, "in the past 15 years, much of our efforts were put into becoming independent from Microsoft," including spending "a lot of money looking for workarounds" but "those efforts eventually failed."

A full council vote on Windows 10 2020 migration is set for November 23, Hübner said. However, the Social Democrats and Conservatives have a majority in the council, and the outcome is expected to be the same as in committee.

She said the cost of the migration will not be made public until November 23, but today about 40 per cent of 30,000 users already have Windows machines.

CSU party council member Kristina Frank told The Reg: "Munich had huge difficulties in communicating with other authorities, communities and other externals.

"As everything needed to be developed by ourselves, the city's IT was 10 to 15 years behind market standard. The City of Munich is not an IT developer, but has other major concerns to deal with."

Hübner said "no final decision has yet been made" on whether LibreOffice will be swapped out for Microsoft Office. "That will be decided at the end of next year when the full cost of such a move will be known."

Peter Ganten, CEO of Univention in Bremen and a member of the Open Source Business Alliance, told El Reg: "The council of the city of Munich has just executed a decision which they have made long before."

Not all agree that it is a good decision.

Ganten said "of course nobody in the open-source community is happy that this decision has been made" and the city will spend "decades of man power" and "millions of euros" on migration (as it did with the LiMux project), while client OSes "becomes more and more unimportant and other organisations are wisely spending their money for platform neutral applications."

Matthias Kirschner, president of Free Software Foundation Europe in Berlin, said "there were never any studies published" pinpointing what people were "unhappy" about. It might have been the LiMux client itself, or perhaps the migration process or lack of support.

He said he was also not aware of a comparison of the unhappiness of staffers in cities using Windows.
 
Linux is simply not easy for the average employee to use. It takes a long time to get used to.
 
That's all good and well, but if a lot of the apps they need are simply not compatible with the platform then it's more about practicality than about ease of use anyway.

Totally agree. Workabouts are too tedious for the average end user as well, as well as for support staff.
 
Keeping an eye open for Munich's disclosure of what they actually spent on the attempted migration to Linux. The whole point, after all, was to save money. Can they politically afford to be open and honest about it? Probably not.
 
Last edited:
Pity, with most software moving to the cloud, as long as you have a browser then most things work.
 
Keeping an eye open for Munich's disclosure of what they actually spent on the attempted migration to Linux. The whole point, after all, was to save money. Can they politically afford to be open and honest about it? Probably not.

Open source is only free to people that don't value time
 
Pity, with most software moving to the cloud, as long as you have a browser then most things work.

From personnel experience, I can sum it up in one word (well maybe 2) Microsoft Office.

Sure you get converters and online replacements, that sort of kinda works but not really. They always tend to f up formatting or suck at converting formula's. Seeing that the council is a public entity I can bet you they deal with a lot of documents not created by them.

I am waaaay past the Linux for everything years in my life, now I use what fits best. Current IT setup Linux PBX, FreeBSD Firewall, Linux host with Windows server VM's. Users running Windows desktops running Office 365. Cause it just works.
 
Pity, with most software moving to the cloud, as long as you have a browser then most things work.

Not many responsible City councils/municipalities will move their data into a cloud that is not completely owned/controlled by them.
 
From personnel experience, I can sum it up in one word (well maybe 2) Microsoft Office.

Sure you get converters and online replacements, that sort of kinda works but not really. They always tend to f up formatting or suck at converting formula's. Seeing that the council is a public entity I can bet you they deal with a lot of documents not created by them.

I am waaaay past the Linux for everything years in my life, now I use what fits best. Current IT setup Linux PBX, FreeBSD Firewall, Linux host with Windows server VM's. Users running Windows desktops running Office 365. Cause it just works.
MS Office does that. A document on one pc might look completely different on the next. Best way to fix is to open said document in LibreOffice.
 
Not many responsible City councils/municipalities will move their data into a cloud that is not completely owned/controlled by them.

This is true for many governments and some NGOs depending on the data.
 
MS Office does that. A document on one pc might look completely different on the next. Best way to fix is to open said document in LibreOffice.

XP / 2003 / 2007 / 2010 is calling and want's their office license back.
 
This is true for many governments and some NGOs depending on the data.

I also cannot imagine even one semi tech-savvy citizen who would approve of data that sensitive to literally be in the hands of someone else. With leaks and things going on these days...
 
Linux is simply not easy for the average employee to use. It takes a long time to get used to.
Don't think it's the OS that's the issue. I used it for a year or so. Perfectly fine as an OS.

It's everything else - media and office tasks in particular.

LibreOffice is simply not comparable unless you're doing fairly simple tasks. And even simple spreadsheets are a challenge - literally every time I start it it's freaking out about attempting to recover some data (?) - I must have clicked on discard a hundred times already. Full of the most bizarre design decisions - e.g. Launching Libre Calc gets me a screen asking whether I'd like to write a word doc or a spreadsheet or a presentation. Ghee...what do you think - I'm launching the calc app. Latest irritation - you can't update it without closing Chrome since it's add some extension there (?). And then there are the years of muscle memory shortcut keys - my offices productivity would halve overnight if we switched.

Don't get me wrong - I use it and even seed it...but these office migration attempts are misguided.
 
Ugh companies should be moving rapidly to vdi and vms anyway. This whole I don't want to use linux on my laptop/desktop is simply cause you want to do other shyte on it than work.

If you work on office excel log into the vdi that has ms excel etc...

Large enterprises are moving billions to virtualise and saving billions on the licensing and support costs.

Also licensing hundreds of dns servers with windows server is dumb and is part of the reason why linux thrives. The GPL's work out way cheaper.
 
Last edited:
Ugh companies should be moving rapidly to vdi and vms anyway. This whole I don't want to use linux on my laptop/desktop is simply cause you want to do other shyte on it than work.

If you work on office excel log into the vdi that has ms excel etc...

Large enterprises are moving billions to virtualise and saving billions on the licensing and support costs.

Also licensing hundreds of dns servers with windows server is dumb and is part of the reason why linux thrives. The GPL's work out way cheaper.
Temporarily at a place that does this. Citrix XenApp thing. It's OK...dislike the slight laggy effects you get even with on site servers. I can see the appeal from security & cost point though
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X