The Coming Terror Attack News

Just to provide some background on current affairs, and to get away from the notion that 'things just happen', in military and political circles - I'm detailing
some of the underlying facts at present. Then will post data as it emerges, which cover items of interest that suggest a game-plan is underway by the various nations.

(Next week is a massive US Naval 'stand down' - info at end of this post.) Given that the last time there was an 'unofficial' military 'stand down' of any note, 911 happened. So its useful to keep a collection of possibly relevant news items, ahead of the next steps in the global war-game.

Here's a quick summary, leading to the latest points of interest..

1. March 20, is the date that Iran begins selling oil for Euro's, not dollars - some economists have suggested that in order to protect the dollar - this can't be allowed to happen. (Saddam Hussein was about to do this, ahead of Gulf War 1)
read Wikipedia on Iranian Oil Bourse:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Oil_Bourse
"Has BUSH forgotten about the Iranian Bourse?"
http://www.teamliberty.net/id217.html
"Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse"
http://www.energybulletin.net/7707.html
"The Iranian Threat: The Bomb or the Euro?"
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8354.htm
"Iran's oil gambit - and potential affront to the US"
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0830/p03s01-wome.html
"The Real Reasons Why Iran is the Next Target: The Emerging Euro-denominated International Oil Marker"
http://www.energybulletin.net/2913.html
'WILL IRAN'S OIL KILL THE US DOLLAR'
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_ID=9752

2. Therefore the US (if economic protection of their currency is as important as it would appear to be) HAS to have a Reason to move against Iran, VERY soon - to disrupt their oil selling ability.

3. The whispers of a deliberate fake nuclear attack by the US on US soil itself, in order to provide massive instant justification for immediate military action against percieved 'enemies' - has been growing for some time.
(A number of 'military exercises' - focusing on reaction to a 'nearby nuclear explosion' - have been done across various cities and bases - mostly in the Southern US, over the last few months.)

4. It has been noted by various media studies, that every time the Bush poll numbers appear to drop, in at least 15 different instances, a 'terror alert' was announced within 48 hours of this poll data being publicised. (Each alert leading to no tangible proof of any actual 'terror'.)
"Government terrorist warnings boost President Bush's approval ratings"
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Oct04/terrorist.Bush.ssl.html
Rating Bush and the Terror Alerts:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/21/opinion/polls/main509623.shtml

5. Bush is currently struggling as polls variously put his popularity as low as 34% - a record low not seen since Nixon.
http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Gallup_Bush_disapproval_rating_lowest_of_0308.html
Not only are his popularity polls at record lows, the overall polls covering aspects of both his, and the UK's various policies, show that public opinion is moving firmly against the current situation.
http://infowars.net/articles/march2006/070306_b_people.htm

Therefore, the odds on 'something' having to happen - which will also quite possibly put the US under martial law, have been increasing steadily.
"Pentagon Devising Scenarios for Martial Law in US"
http://www.gamerswithjobs.com/node/18066
"Friday, Nov. 21, 2003 ..Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government."
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/20/185048.shtml

6. As reported in mainstream news quietly, a little while back, Haliburton has received the go ahead to build a large number of - in essence - 'concentration camps' - to house 'illegal immigrants' and 'others' - theoretically to be used in the event of some kind of emergency.
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/022106a.html

7. Naturally the 'how' of a faked 'terrorist' attack, is not known.
But it would appear to be coming. Nothing else will seem to allow the US to have unanimous approval of its actions, both at home and abroad.
It's just a matter of time, before 'something' happens - which will allow the Bush regime to justifiably 'retaliate' against its 'enemy', and take the neocon's into the next stages of their plans.

What plans? Here's the broad strokes of it:

""Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD)" is a policy document published by a neoconservative Washington think tank called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Its pages have been compared to Hitler's Mein Kampf in that they outline an aggressive military plan for U.S. world domination during the coming century."
read - http://www.antiwar.com/orig/stockbauer1.html

The men who wrote the above mentioned document, are the men who now run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House.

To see the coming future, read 'Project for the new American Century':
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm
Read wikipedia on Project for a New American Century:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

==========================
The above, is the basic background, from which to view any unfolding stories which emerge on the global stage. (We'll see within mere days or weeks, whether the 'Iranian oil bourse' section will be a 'trigger' for the next steps in the overall intended game-plan.)

Thinking 'outside of the box' is necessary, at every step, in order to not get caught up in following the knee-jerk reaction that the NeoCons will rely on, from the media and shocked citizens, in order to follow through on their next steps - once the next 'trigger' occurs.

==================================================

LATEST:

Some folks have noticed the very quiet announcement that a number of Naval bases are to 'stand down' next week.
NAVY TIMES:
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1578809.php
"..the Navy plans to ground all its aircraft for half a day next week for an internal safety review. The stand down will affect 3,800 aircraft and Thousands of naval aviation personnel, including aircraft on 12 carriers around the world."
CNN REPORT:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/03/03/navy.aircraft.grounded.ap/index.html
LA TIMES:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...y?coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true

very very interesting

well the US is going to do something in order to attack iran thats for sure

would be interesting to see if anything will really happen. - we allready know there's a Dork in the Bush...

"World War III: The Iranian Menace" commeth....very, very soon....

@ what stage does it all get too obvious?

so bush props up his rating through war talk (nothing new there) but surely there is a finite number of times you can pull the same stunt before a critical mass of people become aware of what is going on? or am i underestimating the wilful ignorance of what hunter s thompson referred to as the "new dumb"

been here before but it seems apt...

HST from Kingdom of Fear said:

Let's face it--the yo-yo president of the U.S.A. knows nothing. He is a dunce. He does what he is told to do--says what he is told to say--poses the way he is told to pose. He is a Fool.

This is never an easy thing for the voters of this country to accept.

No. Nonsense. The president cannot be a Fool. Not at this moment in time--when the last living vestiges of the American Dream are on the line. This is not the time to have a bogus rich kid in charge of the White House. Which is, after all, our house. That is our headquarters--it is where the heart of America lives. So if the president lies and act giddy about other people's lives--if he wantonly and stupidly endorses mass murder as a logical plan to make sure that we are still Number One--he is a Jackass by definition--a loud and meaningless animal with no fundamental intelligence and no balls.

To say that this goofy child president is looking more and more like Richard Nixon in the summer of 1974 would be a flagrant insult to Nixon.

Whoops! Did I say that? Is it even vaguely possible that some New Age Republican whore-beast of a false president could actually make Richard Nixon look like a liberal?

Click to expand...

Agreed, Nixon was a frightening monster, paranoid, delusional and responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands, if not millions - BUT - he WAS clever.
Whereas Dubya has to be a puppet figurehead of some kind, with Cheney, Wolfowitz and/or Bush Snr pulling the real strings behind the throne. There's just no proof in his public statements and reported behaviour in office, that he has the IQ to be doing much.

ugh i hope they hurry with the nuke program in pakistan, and since US basically gave em the finger they can team up with Iran and maybe we can have a interesting war else its another boring thing and i wanna see US hit hard for their stupidity.

So you would rather have a lunatic from Iran as the world power ? Are you mad ?

bush it not much different

is he not a lunatic?

Yes he is but i don't see him threatening any non-muslim countries so we should be ok for now. This ******* from Iran will nuke anyone who isn't on his side.

yes but he threatens muslim countries which makes them threaten us

well as far as i know america is the only country to have ever nuked anyone

is that correct?

Yip i think that is correct. The Muslims have been causing k@k long before the US started going after them.

craigsa said:

So you would rather have a lunatic from Iran as the world power ? Are you mad ?

Click to expand...

That's not really the question though - and to be fair, there's absolutely no chance of Iran becoming a world power. What I'm interested in, and certainly what I've been watching for a while now, is how the far east reacts over the Iran (actually, the entire middle east) over the next few months.

I find it interesting that many of the statements made by the various Pentagon and Whitehouse spokespeople over the past few days contain *heavy* undertones (in fact with distinctive condescending traces as well) of we'll try the diplomacy route for a little while when referring to the UN Security Council and the imminent referral of Iran thereto.

An attack on US soil would not be as easily sympathised *abroad* this time round, so such an attack would be extremely deliberate in terms of who "did" it...

My biggest concern is that the majority of the American people would have the same attitude as craigsa, even were they to know the truth about what's going on.
They've already shown their willingness to sacrifice freedom for security and continued prosperity.
I think the average American, given the choice, would rather willingly be a part of an evil empire than face economic hardship.

craigsa said:

So you would rather have a lunatic from Iran as the world power ? Are you mad ?

Click to expand...

No one is saying that. I would rather not have a lunatic in power PERIOD (and Bush counts as a lunatic in my book).

well i can tell you now

if the US attack the Iran the whole of the muslim world is going to war with the West

if the US attack we are in for a very rough ride and Jihad will set in.

i told you guys i read that the world end in 2006 and it starts from the middle east but i was told im an idiot so yea heheh

Hold on a sec , if Iran become Nuclear then they become a world power immidiately. Nick i hear what you are saying but i still think the world is unstable because of the rougue states not because of the US. I do think the US are up to no good with oil but as i said i would rather have them in control as we have seen what these other lunatics are capable of.

killadoob said:

i told you guys i read that the world end in 2006 and it starts from the middle east but i was told im an idiot so yea heheh

Click to expand...

I don't think you are an idiot, maybe Nostradamus was a little off on the dates?

oil.

Back in biblical times, just before Lucifer was thrown down from heaven, he managed a last sneek move - burying oil under the middle east.

[that was meant in humour - kind of]

must be oil because bush couldnt care about zimbabwe, but he must free the iraqi ppl, who happen to have alot of oil?

hmmm Iran want a nuclear power like south africa naaaa they got oil they are gonna make bombs

ok but i guess saying that israel should be wiped off the earth is not to good on Iran's part