Beware 419 SMS scams, says WASPA

Not a very useful article. It would be nice to have an example of the content of the sms's being sent so that these messages can be easily identified (Not that it is very difficult to distinguish between a legitimate message and a fraudulent one):confused:
 
Here's an example of something received:
Code:
congratulations! on winning the sum of 1 Million pounds !!Contact: [email]***@gmail.com[/email]
 
Here's an example of something received:
Another one:

STRIKE IT RICH THIS WEEKEND !!! Dial *120*2777# to win R2000 CASH! and R1000s in AIRTIME daily Dial *120*2777# 1.67/unit Reply OUT to stop

OK this might just be spam
 
Not a very useful article. It would be nice to have an example of the content of the sms's being sent so that these messages can be easily identified (Not that it is very difficult to distinguish between a legitimate message and a fraudulent one):confused:

This is to confirm that your cell number have won US$2.8M For FIFA 2010 International Award Ref:UK-3020Z2 to claim contact Mrs.Price via: [email protected]

Received from +278200702404680 on October 14th 2009, 11:23:32

I thought I'd add their email address so they can get some spam themselves :-P
 
ICASA does very little to prevent scams from South African companies... Who woke them up?
 
Not a very useful article. It would be nice to have an example of the content of the sms's being sent so that these messages can be easily identified (Not that it is very difficult to distinguish between a legitimate message and a fraudulent one):confused:

I have almost daily customers from the local black community that want me to send the required email ( you know.. Nike@gmail,co.uk) to claim their Million dollars or pounds from a telephone code in Nigeria, etc. They obviously never entered a Nike competition, but they honestly don't know better. They really hope that this it, the 1 instance that will change their life.

Explaining to them that it is a scam has almost always no effect. They don't want their hope taken away. I have open several web based email accounts for those who don't want to accept that it is a scam. I know this probably not the right thing to do, but as I usually end up with completing the details, I can control the type of info that is being send to the bogus company.

Therefore I think your are a bit condescending when you say that it is easy to identify a legitimate and fraudulent message. It might be for you, but I promise you there are millions out there that can't or won't see it for what it is.
This is not a personal attack on you, but surely you understand that these scams were not invented to catch out the "wise or intelligent" people, but the people that are unsuspecting or ignorant as far as these schemes go?

So maybe it is not a very good article, but it does bring it to peoples attention.
 
Last edited:
WASPA stated that according to the trends that have been reported, it appears users are not charged to receive the fraudulent SMS messages.

What do they mean by this? Surely it is not possible for a user to be charged for receiving a spam SMS. Or do they mean that the 419 scam sms is not being sent by any of the subscription providers in SA for which some users MAY be subscribed to. Very ambiguous statement from WASPA.
 
Agree Borrels, but there is a public hysteria and urban legends about these scams.

Subscription services go through strict testing with the networks. Also only a small fraction of mobile services are able to become subscription based.
 
i wrote an article on SMishing (SMS Phishing) on my blog. Its coming... and its coming soon :) Brace for impact.
 
Therefore I think your are a bit condescending when you say that it is easy to identify a legitimate and fraudulent message. It might be for you, but I promise you there are millions out there that can't or won't see it for what it is.
This is not a personal attack on you, but surely you understand that these scams were not invented to catch out the "wise or intelligent" people, but the people that are unsuspecting or ignorant as far as these schemes go?

So maybe it is not a very good article, but it does bring it to peoples attention.

Agreed, the poorest and least educated are at the most risk. Service providers should take more responsibility in this regard and weed out the unscrupulous vendors and mobile users. Perhaps the RICA regulations may help with this/

Years ago before Telkom was privatized, they too had a premium rate system but this was shut down by the government at the time due to similar issues.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X