quovadis
Honorary Master
How so considering what this label is usually reserved for?They aren't editorially independent.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
How so considering what this label is usually reserved for?They aren't editorially independent.
I did mention it. Why edit my post to remove the relevant bit and repeat the same question?How so considering what this label is usually reserved for?
Huh? I didn't edit your post - I quoted the part I'm asking about - what makes them not editorially independent?I did mention it. Why edit my post to remove the relevant bit and repeat the same question?
You quoted it selectively.Huh? I didn't edit your post - I quoted the part I'm asking about - what makes them not editorially independent?
Superior logic.The fact that they aren't editorially independent makes them not editorially independent.
Yes, that's how quotes work. Since you seem to not get the question. Your entire post was:You quoted it selectively.
So I ask again - What makes them not editorially independent?They aren't editorially independent. That fits the definition of state affiliated media.
It isn't that hard.
Spoken like a true MSM journalist!Yes, that's how quotes work.
Omfg how dare you selectively quote me you MSM journalist!Spoken like a true MSM journalist!
Facts are just facts. There's no logical reasoning required to determine the sky is blue, you just look up.Superior logic.
Yes, that's how quotes work. Since you seem to not get the question. Your entire post was:
So I ask again - What makes them not editorially independent?
So no basis for your statement. Weird.Facts are just facts. There's no logical reasoning required to determine the sky is blue, you just look up.
I don't know what more do you want.
The basis is that it is a observable fact.So no basis for your statement. Weird.
It is? How?The basis is that it is a observable fact.
By the fact that they don't operate editorially independently. Don't know how you can't understand this. I done not going to keep on explaining that 2+2=4 to someone who can't count.It is? How?
Don't feed the troll...It is? How?
Sure guy. Troll on.By the fact that they don't operate editorially independently. Don't know how you can't understand this. I done not going to keep on explaining that 2+2=4 to someone who can't count.
Or people should just learn context and nuance. Sadly lacking amongst online leftists.Hey, if Trump wants his tweets to be characterized as tweets which "constitute 'rhetorical hyperbole'” that’s not good. Don’t take his tweets literally from now on. Bwahaha.
Ah yes a loan is now the same as funding.
Well the left can be summed up as "Selling fools gold to fools" so expect nothing less
How ironic.Or people should just learn context and nuance. Sadly lacking amongst online leftists.
Then again critical thinking seems to be in short supply these days.