c3n0byt3
Expert Member
Am considering a new vehicle and the Mazdas really look like value for money.
They are slightly more expensive than some competitors, but looks and interior are in my opinion the best.
I am thinking about a Mazda2 or at a real stretch Mazda3 (demo).
Mazda2 has some really good reviews regarding driving experience (relative power and gearbox).
My initial thoughts:
Good thing about the Mazda2 is that Skyactiv engine. (However I see CAR magazine specs show 12.0 compression).
Drawback is the size and slightly dinky interior (compared to the 3).
Good thing about the Mazda3 is the interior, even at lower trim.
Drawback is the older 1.6.
So I went to test drive the Mazda2.
I was disappointed in the power and response. It almost seems like they purposely scaled back 1st gear, i.e. it's almost like a diesel when taking off.
Similar to the 2.0 Kia's where they purposely restricted power on takeoff to save the gearbox.
In gear wasn't that much better either. Am I missing something?
I'm coming from a 2001 1.6 corolla. Sure it's more displacement, but the Mazda2 has more power and is lighter. The reasons I was actually considering the 2.
The only thing I can think of is that either the other cars in the segment must REALLY suck, or there was something wrong with the vehicle I test drove.
It was the salesman's daily and on starting had a lumpy idle.
I have yet to test the Mazda3 but from what others have reported and by the numbers I'm not expecting much in the power department.
I do 99% highway driving and need that bit of power modern engines seem to squeeze out.
They are slightly more expensive than some competitors, but looks and interior are in my opinion the best.
I am thinking about a Mazda2 or at a real stretch Mazda3 (demo).
Mazda2 has some really good reviews regarding driving experience (relative power and gearbox).
My initial thoughts:
Good thing about the Mazda2 is that Skyactiv engine. (However I see CAR magazine specs show 12.0 compression).
Drawback is the size and slightly dinky interior (compared to the 3).
Good thing about the Mazda3 is the interior, even at lower trim.
Drawback is the older 1.6.
So I went to test drive the Mazda2.
I was disappointed in the power and response. It almost seems like they purposely scaled back 1st gear, i.e. it's almost like a diesel when taking off.
Similar to the 2.0 Kia's where they purposely restricted power on takeoff to save the gearbox.
In gear wasn't that much better either. Am I missing something?
I'm coming from a 2001 1.6 corolla. Sure it's more displacement, but the Mazda2 has more power and is lighter. The reasons I was actually considering the 2.
The only thing I can think of is that either the other cars in the segment must REALLY suck, or there was something wrong with the vehicle I test drove.
It was the salesman's daily and on starting had a lumpy idle.
I have yet to test the Mazda3 but from what others have reported and by the numbers I'm not expecting much in the power department.
I do 99% highway driving and need that bit of power modern engines seem to squeeze out.
